|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 16th, 2004, 07:24 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Santa Cruz, CA, Seattle, WA, and abroad....
Posts: 65
|
GS400 nicer 4:3 image than DVC30?
I looked through some old threads (maybe even on another board) and saw a couple of comments that the GS400 made nicer 4:3 interlaced footage than the DVC30. So I guess I was wondering if any of you had a similar opinion on this, and if so, was it a matter of sharpness or overall color and image appeal?
Thanks!! |
|
|
|
November 16th, 2004, 09:20 PM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 61
|
Haven't heard that one. I'd really be surprised if the DVC30 image quality was inferior in any way in 4:3.
16:9, that's another story. |
|
|
|
|
November 17th, 2004, 11:53 PM
|
#3 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: astoria new york usa
Posts: 23
|
The dvc-30 by panasonic dvcpro dept with a 12bit processor i doubt the 400 would look better
|
|
|
|
|
November 18th, 2004, 03:03 PM
|
#4 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
A larger quantity of pixels per CCD gives superior 16:9 (resolution and angle of view) to the GS400 hands down but 4:3 seems to me a level playing field.
Even the now discontinued GS100 had superior 16:9 to the DVC30 but thats to be expected with the DVC30's low pixel count per CCD. Of course a low pixel count usually yields better low light performance and I'm sure thats what Panasonic intended. Here are a few 16:9 GS100 and DVC30 frames for comparison Click here |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
