|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 14th, 2004, 05:06 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 130
|
is gs400 bigger?
Is the gs400 bigger then gs100 and dv953 because the lens is bigger and ccds is bigger?
|
May 14th, 2004, 05:19 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 569
|
GS100: 76 x 84 x 167, 650grams w/o batt, 750/ batt
MX5000: 75 x 91 x 179, 750 grams w/o batt, 940 w/ batt |
May 15th, 2004, 03:58 AM | #3 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
I don't think that anyone has seen the GS400's full specs which should include the measurements, so that question about size can't be answered.
|
May 15th, 2004, 05:05 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 569
|
The dimensions 81 x 80 x 178 (700 grams) are written in the GS400 specs posted by Joby at Guy's site, so I thought it should be obvious which is bigger than which :-))
|
May 15th, 2004, 07:27 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 211
|
So putting it all together with information contained in this thread here is the answer to Tom's questions:
GS100: 76 x 84 x 167, 650grams w/o batt, 750/ batt MX5000: 75 x 91 x 179, 750 grams w/o batt, 940 w/ batt GS400: 81 x 80 x 178, 700 grams (not known if this is with or without battery) It would appear, in my humble opinion, that according to the information available, the GS400 at the very least is heavier and larger than the GS100. And, it is larger but lighter than the MX5000. This is possibly all without battery for the GS400. Hope this helps. |
May 15th, 2004, 09:17 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 569
|
That weight is most likely without battery and tape, because, there are usually 3 choices of Pany on-cam batteries available for each cam model.
The given weights with batts of the MX5K and GS100 are based on the batteries supplied with the cam. |
May 15th, 2004, 09:24 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 244
|
it says:
Weight (w/o Battery) 700g... maybe you all need glasses =) |
May 16th, 2004, 06:21 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 211
|
George wrote: >it says: Weight (w/o Battery) 700g...<
What is the source, "it" ? |
May 16th, 2004, 09:46 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 244
|
goto the specs thread and you'll see where the verifications/specs come from.
(the same place the info most of you were talking about here came from) here's the file posted on Guy's web-page http://fortvir.net/modules.php?set_a...view_photo.php |
May 16th, 2004, 06:18 PM | #10 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
The weight has little to do with the size. :-))
|
May 16th, 2004, 06:48 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 130
|
The gs400 is bigger then the bigger mx5000? It has to be because it has bigger ccds and a bigger lens.
|
May 16th, 2004, 06:54 PM | #12 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
According to George's specs, the GS500 is fatter than the MX5000/PV-DV953. Note: fatter is bigger.
|
| ||||||
|
|