|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 25th, 2004, 01:51 AM | #1 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Shouldn't the MX5 and GS100 have 1/3" CCDs?
If the GS400 costs about 1/2 of the MX5 and GS100, but only has 1/6" CCDs, shouldn't the MX5 and GS100 CCD size be 2 X 1/6"? That would be 1/3" CCDs, right?
|
April 25th, 2004, 04:03 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 34
|
But a 1/6" CCD is a *quarter* the size of a 1/3" CCD, not a half :-)
__________________
----- No problem too small to baffle this expert |
April 25th, 2004, 06:39 AM | #3 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Yes, but 2 X 1/6 = 2/6, simplify it, and you get 1/3. :-))
|
April 25th, 2004, 06:51 AM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Other than all the planets in our solar system aligning what else would need to happen for a GS100 to sport 1/3" ccds? Would it have to be fatter (wider)? Has there ever been a compact handheld 1/3" 3CCD?
|
April 25th, 2004, 08:20 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 207
|
but you see bruce ur statement was wrong.
they are not in fact a quater they are a half!!! the reason being is that the measure the "size" of ccd's by measuring across them. It would be true to say that they are 1/4 if you consider the surface area of them but we are not. and anyway frank my suggestion is that to fit 800k on one ccd the size of 1/6 inch would be just as expensive as they same on 1/3 inch because of the refined and detailed process of making them smaller. i would guess that the reason why they might have used the 1/6 is because they could make them more compact. to make 1/3 they would have needed bigger prisms and focal lenses to focus on the larger area. just a suggestion from backyard enthusiast. Justin
__________________
jlboyle |
April 25th, 2004, 10:51 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 268
|
Then people wouldn't buy the DVC80.
|
April 25th, 2004, 11:16 AM | #7 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Quote:
|
|
April 25th, 2004, 05:09 PM | #8 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Who wouldn't buy the DVC80? The Japanese? I think there's a strong market for puffed-plastic, so the DVC80 would still sell.
|
| ||||||
|
|