|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 15th, 2003, 11:00 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 268
|
the future of DV camcorder?
|
|
|
|
December 15th, 2003, 11:06 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 268
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 15th, 2003, 11:43 PM
|
#3 |
|
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Thanks for these links. I checked the first link, but its coding was so badly bloated, with java script errors, it locked my computer. The first link is about a lowly consumer MPEG4 cam. Whereas DV is capable of 540 lines of playback, MPEG is only capable of 480. Plus MPEG is super-compressed, not a good editing format as DV.
Should I dare to attempt the 2nd nonPana link? Naaa. I don't want to reboot my computer. :-) |
|
|
|
|
December 16th, 2003, 12:15 AM
|
#4 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
The second link is the dismal duo cam by Samsung. It has the flipping CCD unit with a 10X optical zoom and DV CCD on one side and a 3X optical zoom 4.1MP CCD on the other.
Reviews I've read say its a jack of all trades but a master of none. |
|
|
|
|
December 16th, 2003, 02:16 AM
|
#5 |
|
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Figures.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
