|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 17th, 2010, 12:28 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Warren, Pa
Posts: 785
|
HMC150 Help Please
I have been thinking of selling my Sony EX1r and replacing it with a Canon 5D II and a HMC150.
I am a photographer and have the 1ds III and 1D IV bodies with lots of L glass. I do a few weddings a year that include very basic video, mainly solid video with a highlight show mixing video and stills. I do have a Sony PMC-D50 so have a good audio source. I need a good video camera that can be unmanned on a tripod at the back of the church. I feel the 5DII will give me a 2nd, or 3rd video camera, and also serve as a backup to my 1D bodies. I use Adobe Premier CS4 to edit, and really wanting to stay under $4000 and tapeless, but need it to mix well in editing with DSLR's. Would this camera fit the bill, or would you suggest something else? |
March 21st, 2010, 11:58 AM | #2 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 10
|
150 would work great for this...or HM40..?
From what you are saying is your requirements, I would say that the 150 would do the job fine. You also might consider the AG-HMC40 as a cheaper alternative, but I like my 150. They both have long running ability, so you can set it on a tripod and forget it, while you get your closeups with the Canon, or something like it.
|
March 22nd, 2010, 04:20 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 31
|
Possible trade?
I have a new this month HMC150 and about a 4 month old 5D MKII camera body. Actually I have two of them. I would be willing to trade them for your EX1. Have boxes and all accessories for both. Interested, let me know and I can give you more info.
|
March 25th, 2010, 11:49 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 40
|
Hi Denny,
I think you would be happy with the 150, we have 2 of them and an HMC-40. I recommend the 150 over the 40 if you are just going to have one. The 150 does much better in low light, and it's got a wider lens. You'd be frustrated with the lack of wide angle coverage of the 40 most likely (about 28mm equivalent vs. 40mm between the two cameras I think), and in low light you'd probably have a harder time getting it to look good next to the Canon video. You'll also love that you can get up to 3 hours of straight video on one 35GB SDHC card with either of these cameras. Just turn it on and let it roll. You will need an extra battery though, I think you'll only get a couple of hours of life out of the battery that comes with it. Get the big one, about $140, and you'll be good on battery life. Robert |
| ||||||
|
|