|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 21st, 2009, 07:39 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 368
|
Still no word on the availability of the HMC-40. I was hoping it would come in around the middle of August but it looks like early September now.
|
August 21st, 2009, 11:48 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 477
|
Reading the specs on the HMC40 it looks like it's VERY CLOSE (identical?) inside to the Panasonic HS300 consumer cam. That is a very nice piece of gear, Look at how the HS300 performs-odds are it will be the same cam as the HMC40 in video performance.
|
August 22nd, 2009, 02:12 AM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 8,441
|
Hi Bob
The first thing that put me off was the 3MOS chips so I second your comments!!! I see that Panasonic have already said that a firmware update will be available for the rolling shutter. The Flash Band Compensation firmware upgrade compensates for the “flash band” effect experienced by most MOS-based imagers. * As these imagers utilize rolling shutter, which records images line by line instead of simultaneously, as with global shutter technology, they tend to be susceptible to image variance when a light flashes during shooting. A light band (flash band) can appear in the continuous two frames when a flash occurs… * As there is still a possibility for the appearance of discontinuous motion with excessive camera movement or when recording very high-speed objects, care should be taken in these shooting conditions. I wonder if these cameras will also have the dreaded "jello" effect with vibration??? We have a wedding resort here where I do a fair number of jobs and the photoshoot party are taken to various locations in a single cylinder golf cart..My CCD's are not affected but any other CMOS camera would have problems!!! Chris |
August 22nd, 2009, 07:44 AM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
where as the HS300 will only go up to HA mode (17Mbps / VBR). |
|
August 22nd, 2009, 09:48 AM | #20 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 195
|
It also offers more shooting modes: 1080/60i, 1080/30p, 1080/24p (Native); 720/60p, 720/30p, 720/24p (Native)
__________________
www.speedandmotion.com |
August 22nd, 2009, 11:01 AM | #21 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LA, California
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
The HMC-150 has a CCD, but costs more. Any camera with a CMOS chip (or chips) will show some rolling shutter effect. Mostly on whip pans (with a fast shutter speed) and with flash photos. The whip pans can be avoided, but flash pictures aren't avoidable. One interesting this I noticed with CMOS, if the shutter speed is long, like 1/30 of a second, the odds improve that the flash will occur when the shutter is fully open. You can still get a split image on the flash (flash appears on bottom half frame 1, top half frame 2), but it's less likely than with a higher speed shutter. The down side of this solution is that you end up with more motion blur. Bob Diaz |
|
August 23rd, 2009, 07:02 AM | #22 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 195
|
The HMC40 also allows you to use a LANC like this one VariZoom Lens Controls, monitors, Camera Stabilizers & Supports, Batteries, Monitor Kits Phone: 512-219-7722
__________________
www.speedandmotion.com |
August 23rd, 2009, 09:22 AM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
Nice piece of gear, but it will perform poorly in low light. If you work in lowlight conditions at all the puny 1/4" chips will not be so great.
|
August 24th, 2009, 03:19 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 368
|
Does anyone know why they dropped their price from over 3k to $1995?
All the original press releases said the camera would come out and retail for over 3K. |
September 2nd, 2009, 06:05 PM | #25 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 170
|
The HMC looks interesting. I just saw some footage from an AG-HMC41E over on Vimeo. Impressive images in bright light and low-light performance didn't seem too bad. Looking at the specs, I can see the camera has a native 24p mode but no cinegamma type setting to achieve a more film-like look.
The price is right though. |
September 2nd, 2009, 07:52 PM | #26 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 127
|
Quote:
The brochure for the camera is available from the Panasonic website. Rich |
|
September 2nd, 2009, 10:54 PM | #27 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LA, California
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
Quote:
Two things that do need to be added to the total cost are the 2-Channel XLR Mic Adapter AG-MYA30G $300 and a 0.7x wide angle adapter VW-W4307HPPK $225. Even if you purchase both items, the total is only $2,525. Still a very good price point. I can't wait for DV Expo to try out the camera.... Bob Diaz |
||
September 3rd, 2009, 09:13 AM | #28 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
This has happened a few times among manufacturers. The JVC HD100 and Panasonic HVX200 were both announced as being "under $10,000" and both came in at about $6,000. The Sony EX3 was announced with an MSRP of $13,000 but actually came in at $9990 MSRP. Back at NAB when they showed the HMC40 at $3200, I thought "nice little camera, but that seems way high". At $1995 it seems like a screaming deal.
|
September 4th, 2009, 04:07 PM | #29 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
|
|
September 4th, 2009, 06:59 PM | #30 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
Rich, Thanks for the info. I stand corrected about the HMC40's cinegamma capabilities. When I looked at the official HMC40 brochure from Panasonic, it mentioned nothing about the various gamma settings, so that's why I thought it didn't offer them. You're right that the '40 offers a far more extensive range of controls than the HS300/TM300. Before purchasing a Canon HF-S100, I had considered buying a TM300. I chose not to go with the TM300 because it didn't offer enough manual control. The Canon doesn't offer as many manual controls as I would like either, but it offers more than the TM300 does. The TM300 also costs substantially more money than the Canon. I'm looking at getting either a HMC150 or a HMC40 next spring, depending on what my budget allows. The Canon is nice, but I find that its LCD panel tends to wash out in moderately bright outdoor light, sometimes even with an LCD hood attached. The HMC40 offers both an LCD panel and a conventional viewfinder. |
|
| ||||||
|
|