|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 9th, 2009, 11:39 AM | #1 |
Tourist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2
|
HMC150 f/1.4 vs f/1.8 with Redrock M2e
I recently purchased a HMC150 and love it! I'm looking into getting a Redrock M2e, but am unsure about which lenses to get. I love the Zeiss kit, but way too expensive. I was looking at the Nikon lenses as well.
Question #1) With the HMC150 (specifically), will I "really" notice a difference bewtween the f/1.4 and f/1.8 lenses? I do shoot indoors a lot with the iris open (HMC150 open = f/1.6 I believe). I realize that I will be losing a 1/2 stop of light with the 35mm adapter due to the flip module. Question #2) What I don't understand is if the HMC150 lens is f/1.6 fully open, then how can I gain anything with a f/1.4 lens in front of it? It still has to pass through the stock camera lens anyway (which can only take f/1.6), right? Question #3) Does Redrock have "follow focus rings" for the Nikon lenses? I only saw Zeiss rings on their website (unless I missed it). Thank you in advance! Jason |
July 10th, 2009, 01:45 PM | #2 | ||
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
You're going to be losing more than 1/2 stop due to the fact that you'll have to zoom way in to the ground glass. In practice, you'll be losing about 3-4 stops than if you shot default HMC. Quote:
Yes, their size A gear I believe. |
||
July 19th, 2009, 05:27 PM | #3 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
|
|
July 20th, 2009, 11:25 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Easton, Maryland
Posts: 497
|
I am in the same boat so if you could explain it ("what depth of field is, and how factors such as aperture/iris and focal length affect it"), that would be great.
Thanks, simon |
| ||||||
|
|