|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 22nd, 2008, 07:28 AM | #16 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
The DVX100 is standard definition. This camera is high definition.
|
April 22nd, 2008, 07:54 AM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,067
|
oh I see well it may be to soon for those kinda price drops in the HD world.
|
April 22nd, 2008, 09:18 AM | #18 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 23
|
The best VALUE?
Upon further thought, I'll have to agree with Randy and Joe that the pricing for this unit is just about right on the mark.
I consult with new and emerging non-profits and faith-based organizations, and I was hoping for a "miracle" affordable camcorder that "has it all" that I could recommend to my clients. With all its limitations, that'll probably be the HMC70. |
April 22nd, 2008, 02:56 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 418
|
|
April 22nd, 2008, 11:24 PM | #20 | ||
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
April 22nd, 2008, 11:25 PM | #21 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
|
April 22nd, 2008, 11:27 PM | #22 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Uses the same chipset as the HVX200A. The HVX and HD100 were about the same, noise and sensitivity-wise. The HVX200A is a half-stop faster (500 ISO instead of 320) and much cleaner in noise. You could probably gain up by at least 3dB, if not 6dB, before matching the HVX/HD100 noise level. So, as far as a practical matter goes, the 150 should (SHOULD) be around a stop faster for equivalent grain, maybe as much as 1.5 stops faster.
|
April 22nd, 2008, 11:28 PM | #23 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
|
April 23rd, 2008, 10:59 AM | #25 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,067
|
Quote:
I assume when you say "faster" you mean "brighter" which means it may be anywhere from .5 to 1.5 stops brighter than the GY-HD100. thats a pretty big deal for me. |
|
April 23rd, 2008, 11:26 AM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Posts: 93
|
|
April 23rd, 2008, 11:50 AM | #27 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Standard definition recording is not an option with AVCHD camcorders.
|
April 23rd, 2008, 11:58 AM | #28 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 41
|
|
April 23rd, 2008, 12:11 PM | #29 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Posts: 93
|
Bufff, this means bye-bye DVD.
And I don't think that DVD format will dissapear soon. At this time, is the universal format to deliver video. How many time it will survive? I don't know, but sure one or two years, or more as "universal compatible" to deliver a work (very cheap and acceptable quality). Yes, you can record HD and downconvert by software, but it means a lot of time, files, space on your computer. SD option is great for conferences, INTERNET and a lot of works that don't requiere HD. It's sad if camcorder makers ignore this niche. |
April 23rd, 2008, 12:14 PM | #30 | |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|