|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 26th, 2006, 09:20 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 31
|
Best DeInterlacer Software ?
There is a slew of DeInterlace apps out there, which one delivers the best results ?
Thanks |
January 27th, 2006, 12:59 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 382
|
Deinterlacing: Fieldskit
24p deinterlacing: Magic Bullet Free: Avisynth (PC only) |
January 27th, 2006, 02:13 PM | #3 |
RED Problem Solver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,365
|
Well, my Film Effects does great 24p which many prefer to MB.
Fields Kit is excellent, but then again, so is the new de-interlace I have for my FinalTouch plugins, which looks really really sharp. Graeme
__________________
www.nattress.com - filters for FCP |
January 27th, 2006, 02:30 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 126
|
I've been very happy with DVFilm.
-Eric |
January 27th, 2006, 02:45 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 31
|
great ! Thanks for the replys - I'm going to try out the demos :)
|
January 27th, 2006, 03:34 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 382
|
Quote:
I do like Film Effects, but I have had a lot of issues with the demo (v2.5.1 i think - seen this with others as well). Color processing is great, the 24/30p options are fantastic and looks right, but I get noticable horizontal banding in the render. It doesn't have anything to do with the watermark or quasi-pulldown/interlacing - it's 3 or 4 horizontal bands that show up generally everytime there's a cut. It only shows up in 24p (30p seems fine) and experimenting with field options or patterns doesn't remove it (rather it staggers it). |
|
January 27th, 2006, 04:20 PM | #7 |
RED Problem Solver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,365
|
I don't have a forum. I just hang around on other people's.
Do you have any other filters applied along with the 24p, and how are you monitoring. FCP does a rather poor preview in it's windows. Failing that, send me details of your set up, your timeline, what type of footage, etc. and I'll find a solution - it's probably something simple in what you're doing. Graeme
__________________
www.nattress.com - filters for FCP |
January 27th, 2006, 04:28 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 382
|
I'll see if I can get some screenshots and shoot you an email. It's definitely something in the render/export process (rather than a preview) as I've tried authoring some DVDs with the footage to see how it looks on the boob toob. Shows up in the file.
Thanks! |
January 27th, 2006, 04:34 PM | #9 |
RED Problem Solver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,365
|
Could be a field order issue. That's something we can definately find where your workflow is going astray.
Graeme
__________________
www.nattress.com - filters for FCP |
| ||||||
|
|