|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 4th, 2012, 12:00 AM | #31 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
My bad. Didn't see that the first time for some reason. I will check it out. Thanks.
|
December 4th, 2012, 06:52 PM | #32 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Ok. I see the downside...you dont get to select the upgrade options when you go refurb. So it would have to already have the maxed out processor etc. if thats what you wanted. Also you would have to know what those options were for older models. Anyone know where you can find that info?
|
December 4th, 2012, 09:02 PM | #33 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 110
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Quote:
here is your info on the mid 2011 model options. iMac (21.5-inch and 27-inch, Mid 2011) - Technical Specifications
__________________
www.boostedfilms.com?r=DVinfosig |
|
December 4th, 2012, 09:51 PM | #34 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Richmond, Va, Usa
Posts: 20
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
The real problem with the new iMacs is that there is no FW800 and you cannot open them up and upgrade the harddrive yourself. In fact, there is no space to add a 2nd HD. Basically Apple just said forget it to people who wanted a MacPro "Light" by purchasing a 27.5" iMac and then refitting it.
I had been thinking about one but after these revelations about its insides I have stopped considering it. It will become a white elephant. |
December 5th, 2012, 12:26 AM | #35 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Thanks for the info on the mid-2011s. I'll know what to look out for now.
|
December 5th, 2012, 07:01 AM | #36 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Quote:
|
|
December 5th, 2012, 08:21 AM | #37 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 470
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Changing the HDD directly shouldn't be impossibly hard, you mainly just remove the screen to get access to it - it's replacing the optical drive in the older iMacs with a 2nd HDD that requires disassembling practically the entire computer (which is what most of the videos on youtube are demonstrating).
|
December 5th, 2012, 11:07 PM | #38 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
So these new ones have SSD drives instead of. . .um. . .spinning drives? Are these stable? I used to read how solid state drives were prone to spontaneous failure.
And I've read elsewhere that this fusion drive something something is super fast, worth upgrading to, makes all your stuff faster (not just certain applications). Are these options on the mid-2011 or only the newest ones? |
December 6th, 2012, 05:34 AM | #39 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
It is my understanding that the Fusion drive automatically transfers apps and files located on the hard drive portion of the Fusion drive which are used most into the Flash area of the drive.
I ordered mine with just the 3TB spinning HD rather than the Fusion drive or SSD. Solid state drives are still too small and costly for my taste. By the time they start selling large low cost SSDs it will be time to buy a new computer. I will be adding a very fast thunderbolt RAID which will help to alleviate the biggest bottle neck which is media read/write times. And I'm really looking forward to editing with dual 27" monitors. :) |
December 6th, 2012, 09:00 AM | #40 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 110
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Quote:
Quote:
Josh, What are you using now and what is your budget? If you need to save some money, you can go the same route I did. If you have some cash to spare, you can go the way David did. I recommend getting the best processor you can afford, and pick your other battles from there on where to save money.
__________________
www.boostedfilms.com?r=DVinfosig |
||
December 6th, 2012, 01:48 PM | #41 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Right now I'm on my '08 Imac. when I got the machine, I did so as sort of an "experiment" (it was my first mac), so didn't spec it out fully, etc.
Now of course I'm integrated/stuck in the Apple world, so I'd want to go whole hog, BUT not whole hog enough to get a Mac Pro because I edit for pay only occasionally (also do my own personal projects), and do not work with the super high end formats/resolutions (RED, etc.) and do not see that changing. Could I get the latest and greatest fully specced out right this second? Yes. Should I, instead of getting a Mid-2011 that might be nearly as good? That's what I'm trying to decide. My instinct is to get best processor, Max out RAM, max out graphics card, etc. So what if right now nothing I have takes advantage of all that stuff? That doesn't mean it won't in a year or two. I'm shamefully unfamiliar with the whole RAID thing, period. I'm still old school. . .main HD for programs/project files (in FCP, etc.), external firewire HD for media, storage, backup. So not sure what advantages are of RAID vs. SSD vs plain ol' spinny spinny drive. |
December 6th, 2012, 06:29 PM | #42 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Well spending $300 on Thunderbolt cables flat out sucks!
|
December 6th, 2012, 08:59 PM | #43 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Monreal, Quebec,Canada
Posts: 249
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Well, I have read this thread with great interest, I need to buy a new box and I am not thrilled with the Apple offerings and I own 8 Macs currently. The Mac pro is coming...so is...whats his name again? I run two suites and one has two esata towers with 8 drives in each. The box runs a RocketRaid and a BlackMagic DeckLink Studio card. I have lots of "stock' on the arrays and often need to run stuff in and out from as early as SD betacam and later HDV so I need the flexibility in the I/O of the box. As much as I would love to have a sleek new iMac it would mean that I have to invest a ton in new peripherals and cables and what ever else to make my system work. The iMac might be fine for some but more and more I am leaning towards moving my systems over to the "other"OS and going with Avid or Premiere. It seems its that or a Hackintosh.
__________________
Brian Murphy Director-Editor-DoP Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto |
December 7th, 2012, 12:03 AM | #44 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
Did i just read the new imacs dont have a freakin disc drive? As in nowhere to insert dvds or burn them from? That is just...wow.
|
December 7th, 2012, 06:18 AM | #45 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Re: The Imac dilemma
I ordered a USB SuperDrive with mine.
The only time I really use one now is when loading software from disc. |
| ||||||
|
|