|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 15th, 2012, 11:50 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 47
|
Quick HD Question. 5400 vs 7200 for storage
I am currently using a '11 MacBook Pro as my editing work station. I upgraded my HDD to a SSD and moved the factory 750GB 5400rpm HD into the optical bay in which I use for personal storage(music, movies, etc), my photography business and Lightroom library and some other media storage. I do most of my video editing off of OWC 7200rpm Elite Minis and Dual Minis.
My question is, will notice any significant performance difference when editing photos or videos stored on my factory MBP HD in the optical bay by upgrading the that HD to a 750GB 7200 WD Black HD?
__________________
www.chadandreo.com - Creative Portraiture and Cinematography https://vimeo.com/chadandreo |
October 16th, 2012, 04:44 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Zealand, Rapaura (near Blenheim)
Posts: 434
|
Re: Quick HD Question. 5400 vs 7200 for storage
Why limit yourself to 7200rpm? The 10,000rpm 3rd gen Velociraptors, for instance, can do a sustained throughput of 200MB/s. That will be well over twice as fast as your 540rpm drive.
Tech ARP - Western Digital VelociRaptors Vs. Solid State Drives Rev. 2.0 As per your question re editing stills, I feel certain you would notice a more fluid and smoother workflow. I have a pair of the much slower 2nd gen 600Gb V'raptors in a rain0 that give sustained read & write of 250MB/s for video projects, but my stills are on a pair of 1TB WD Blacks in a raid0 with gives me a bit over 200MB/s sustained transfer speeds. RAW files load more or less instantly. It's only multi-layered PSD files where I might notice a small delay in loading. (the above times where recorded with Crystal Benchmark)
__________________
Stills at: www.flickr.com/photos/trevor-dennis/ |
October 16th, 2012, 11:57 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 47
|
Re: Quick HD Question. 5400 vs 7200 for storage
Thanks for the suggestion. I wish I could use something like that, but its apparently .6" too thick for my model MBP.
That seems to be the issue with all fast drives with non-17" MBP.
__________________
www.chadandreo.com - Creative Portraiture and Cinematography https://vimeo.com/chadandreo |
October 17th, 2012, 03:20 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Zealand, Rapaura (near Blenheim)
Posts: 434
|
Re: Quick HD Question. 5400 vs 7200 for storage
How about USB3 externals? I have four WD My Books, and Crystal Benchmark scores them at 110MB/s continuous through put read and write.
__________________
Stills at: www.flickr.com/photos/trevor-dennis/ |
October 17th, 2012, 11:58 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 47
|
Re: Quick HD Question. 5400 vs 7200 for storage
That wont work for me either. Only the current model MBPs come with USB3.
__________________
www.chadandreo.com - Creative Portraiture and Cinematography https://vimeo.com/chadandreo |
October 18th, 2012, 01:29 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Zealand, Rapaura (near Blenheim)
Posts: 434
|
Re: Quick HD Question. 5400 vs 7200 for storage
Sorry Chad, but I know next to nothing about Macs, but a quick Google told me the original MBPs had four 16 lane PCI card slots:
Mac Pro: About the PCI Express slots I would imagine that is more than fast enough to support USB3. My first two WD My Book externals were attached to my old system via PCI card sockets. The drivers were a wee bit flakey though.
__________________
Stills at: www.flickr.com/photos/trevor-dennis/ |
October 18th, 2012, 01:38 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 47
|
Re: Quick HD Question. 5400 vs 7200 for storage
Thanks, but I had the unfortunate luck of buying one of the few models without one. In 2011, only the 17" came with the express-card port.
Here is more about the model that I have Lookup Mac Specs By Serial Number, Order, Model & EMC Number, Model ID @ EveryMac.com 15" 2.2 i7 256SSD 16GB Ram 1GB AMD Radeon HD 6750M
__________________
www.chadandreo.com - Creative Portraiture and Cinematography https://vimeo.com/chadandreo |
October 18th, 2012, 02:50 PM | #8 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 7
|
Re: Quick HD Question. 5400 vs 7200 for storage
Quote:
My CPU is a quad core i7 and can virtually have up to 8 CPUs. But still it's the processor that is the bottleneck and it uses all CPU power to convert my footage. |
|
| ||||||
|
|