|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 11th, 2005, 09:08 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ohio
Posts: 31
|
how was this done?
|
April 11th, 2005, 09:48 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 256
|
I'm not clear on what you have a question about. How did they make those great shots? What wide angle lens did they use? How did they edit it together? What is the name of the dog at the end?
Let us know and maybe we can be more helpful. |
April 11th, 2005, 09:58 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
The answer to the question might be: They cut out all of the shots that did not go in.
|
April 11th, 2005, 10:23 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 356
|
I know some of those guys, but I don't know how they did that. Im sure the ball was green screend some how
|
April 11th, 2005, 10:36 AM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 1,520
|
I doubt it. I figure that they just only show us 1 out of every 100 shots or so.
|
April 11th, 2005, 11:27 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 636
|
Practice.
And lots of burned tape.
__________________
Realism, anyway, is never exactly the same as reality, and in the cinema it is of necessity faked. -- J-L G |
April 11th, 2005, 11:29 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ohio
Posts: 31
|
i dont see how any of those shots are possible. i was thinking it was like a powerade commerical. like michael vick throwing a football 300 yards or lebron james sinking 6 shots from 100 feet.
|
April 11th, 2005, 01:05 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
This has been cross-posted in the main open forum.
You should leave your thread in just one forum because otherwise things get confusing and out of hand. EDIT: A moderator merged the threads. This was formerly cross-posted. |
April 11th, 2005, 01:25 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 221
|
think of how many shots they had to cut out...
|
April 11th, 2005, 03:03 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Posts: 721
|
Each of the shots are very do-able. You just gotta be good...
Just like 9 ball ... 5 banks is easy when you repeat repeat repeat And since mini dv tape is only a couples o' bucks per, let it roll. |
April 11th, 2005, 04:16 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York City, NY
Posts: 316
|
How is this possible?! Even 1 out of 100 shots seems unlikely. There HAS to be some digital trickery at work here... Right?
Unbelievable. |
April 11th, 2005, 05:15 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: stately Eldora Road
Posts: 386
|
Keyword: "unlikely," not impossible.
"HAS to" ...? Nope. Cf: law of averages, crossed with lots of time, practice and talent. Note that this is shot indoors; these guys had all the time they needed to get these clips. |
April 11th, 2005, 06:41 PM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Posts: 721
|
See my reply in the other forum.
Please do not multi/cross-post. |
April 11th, 2005, 07:17 PM | #14 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Moderator note: all three threads have been merged into a single one in the Open DV forum. As others have pointed out, do not cross post at DVinfo. Thanks.
|
April 11th, 2005, 10:07 PM | #15 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
That hoop doesn't look regulation size to me. It would make a huge difference if it wasn't.
You probably could use digital trickery, but I think luck (combined with talent) is cheaper. |
| ||||||
|
|