March 28th, 2004, 04:40 AM | #331 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Are you buying a PAL cam in India? $750 US Dollars? Maybe the Sony TRV38?
|
March 28th, 2004, 05:35 AM | #332 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: India
Posts: 5
|
No I am not buying it in India. But yes, it should be PAL. Yes USD.
|
March 28th, 2004, 06:45 AM | #333 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
I believe Panasonics come with a better international warranty, but I'd take a look at that TRV38. You get quite a bit for the money with that cam. Here's a good site that has consumer cam reviews:
http://www.dvspot.com |
March 29th, 2004, 12:28 AM | #334 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: India
Posts: 5
|
How about SONY TRV70? Though it is around 775USD.
|
March 29th, 2004, 03:05 AM | #335 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
That's a good cam also, but for more money. Maybe just shoot for a 3-chip?
|
March 29th, 2004, 11:07 AM | #336 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 621
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Frank Granovski : That's a good cam also, but for more money. Maybe just shoot for a 3-chip? -->>>
Is there a PAL version of the Panasonic PV-GS70? It's a 3-chipper at only $700 -- 3 CCDs means maybe better colors, but will the 1/6" chips have worse low-light performance than the single 1/4" CCD in, say, my $300 PV-DV53? Something to ask... B&H has the NTSC version of the PVGS70 here: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=search&Q=&b=246&shs=PV-GS70&ci=1&ac=&Submit.x=22&Submit.y= And regarding lowlight: indoor light -- what may seem like normal lighting -- can still be "low-light" to a camcorder. I shot some footage of a band playing live at a radio station recently -- the room seemed fairly normally lit, maybe a skosh dim, but I had to have both of my cameras' gains maxed out in order to even approach proper exposure. I was using a DVC80 and the DV53; the DVC80 at +12dB gain looks a little grainy, but still pretty good. The DV53's maxed out image was still fairly dark (darker than the DVC80) and very grainy and pixelated. So a room that may seem "normally lit" may not cut it for video. (By the way, I also shot an outdoor birthday party -- on a very sunny day -- with the DV53 and I must say I was very happy with this $300 camera's performance; of course, many cheap DV cams will look great if you've got a lot of light...) |
March 29th, 2004, 12:13 PM | #337 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Frank Granovski : That's a good cam also, but for more money. Maybe just shoot for a 3-chip? -->>>
For only $250 more for a used Gl1. I'd certainly consider putting in some overtime to make the step up.
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
April 1st, 2004, 06:25 PM | #338 |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4
|
DV camcorder for shooting watersport DVD
I'm looking for a DV camcorder for shooting watersport videos for DVD (kitesurf, windsurf, surf,...) and other extreme sports events. I'm willing to pay <=2000USD
Optical zoom is pretty important to be able to shoot from the beach, but shoots will be taken from the water as well. GL2 looks like a good camcorder (zoom x20, EWA marine underwater bag). DVC30 (zoom 1.6) could also be nice. Any recommandations ? |
April 1st, 2004, 06:56 PM | #339 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 745
|
You've found out the long zoom cams in your price range, good eye.
I would go for the DVC30. Smart looking, well stocked cam. I don't know how third party support of this cam is coming along... Those bags are cam specific?
__________________
Breakthrough In Grey Room |
April 9th, 2004, 05:10 PM | #340 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 144
|
Choose a cam
I am ready to buy a camera but there are now more options. XL-1S, a JVC HD cam, or a Panasonic 24p cam? I use my school's XL-1s all the time, so I know how to use that and know what it can do. Plus I have the all the stuff edit with it. I am unsure if that stuff changes when I change formats. Some insight would be nice. I will be using he cam all the time. Contract work, like wedding videos, commercials, as well as indie films, short and feature. So thats why I am on the line so to speak. As for money, I would like to stay below $4500. Some insight would be nice.
|
April 9th, 2004, 05:15 PM | #341 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 473
|
Clint,
I'd wait till after NAB. Several new models are due to be announced. You could either save significantly on todays cams OR find a new HD that may fit your budget. |
April 9th, 2004, 05:21 PM | #342 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
If you need a cam now for weddings etc, perhaps look at the JVC DV300 (good price), the DVC80 or the PD170 from B&H.
|
April 9th, 2004, 06:51 PM | #343 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 144
|
Ok, well maybe the question I am asking is what format I should go with. DV, 24p, or HDV?
|
April 9th, 2004, 07:08 PM | #344 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
24P like from a DVX100/A? That's a miniDV NTSC cam.
Re: "Contract work, like wedding videos, commercials, as well as indie films, short and feature. So thats why I am on the line so to speak." Any of the 3 cams I mentioned should be good for these. |
April 9th, 2004, 08:24 PM | #345 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 144
|
your right, my bad. I'm just lost.
|
| ||||||
|
|