|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 26th, 2004, 10:31 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St.Thomas, Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 428
|
Mixing "true" 16:9 with "fake" 16:9
I am going to be shooting a short film for a bunch of friends and I was hoping to shoot it in 16:9 if possible.
My TRV38 can shoot in true 16:9 but the other camera (TRV-18) can't. What would be the best way to combine the footage of the two cameras in post? Would it be best to shoot the TRV-18 footage in 4:3 and then just crop it in post? Or use the fake 16:9 effect on the TRV18? I am affraid of shooting with the effect as it might lessen the resolution overall. Any suggestions? |
March 26th, 2004, 03:24 PM | #2 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
If you use both cameras, the footage will look very different. I would just stick with using the TRV38.
|
March 26th, 2004, 06:22 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ashford, AL
Posts: 937
|
Why don't you just shoot some test clips with both cameras and bring them onto the timeline to see what looks best?
|
March 27th, 2004, 10:19 AM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Using the in-camera 16:9 or cropping 4:3 in post will both reduce resolution by 25%. Another question is whether the TRV18 records 16:9 anamorphically or letterboxed?
|
March 27th, 2004, 01:14 PM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 14
|
Why are you using two cameras? Just curious.
|
March 27th, 2004, 06:47 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St.Thomas, Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 428
|
The reason for two cameras was because we are trying to get the whole thing shot in one day. We only have access to this location on the one day. So I was trying to streamline the production.
|
| ||||||
|
|