|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 3rd, 2004, 02:28 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 64
|
Canon Xi samples, some are deinterlaced. Large.
I created a 1.5 minute file from my Optura Xi. It was shot indoors on New Years day in 16:9 mode. The file was edited in Vegas and encoded into WM9 with VBR 75% for the audio and VBR 6Mbps for the video (two pass encoding).
These files are 70MB each. http://www.photomosaic.com/movies I am not sure how WM9 deinterlaces, but it looks soft, so maybe it is just chucking one set of fields? CanonXiShort.wmv is the interlaced file rendered into WM9 CanonXiVirtualDub-deinterlaced.wmv was deinterlaced in VirtualDub with the default setting which blends the fields. This method is known to ghost moving edges, but otherwise has no other artifacts. I like this method because the ghosting looks like film motion blur. VirtualDub-Adeinterlace.wmv uses a smart motion-detecting plugin from http://www.alparysoft.com/prod/deinterlace.php VirtualDub-Smart.wmv uses another smart algorithm (http://neuron2.net/smart.html) The edges of the smart algoritms are sharper, but also have jaggies, and you can sometimes see swimming textures in the images, so I am not sure they are best! first.ASF is an mpeg-4 output direct from the Xi. This plays in WM9 but will automatically download a codec. For general reference: http://100fps.com/ and http://nickyguides.digital-digest.co...rlace-test.htm This one I have not tried yet: http://compression.graphicon.ru/vide.../index_en.html |
January 4th, 2004, 05:03 PM | #2 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
So you are testing de-interlacing methods? Do you have a
conclusion? And if so, what is it? (not everybody has the time or bandwidth to download all of your sample movies, especially at those sizes.)
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
January 4th, 2004, 05:17 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 64
|
I tested them for use with DV only.
The 'Smart' deinterlace filter for VirtualDub has artifacts that are very serious, so I can't use it. The AreaDeinterlace filter is good (http://biphome.spray.se/gunnart/video/) and I would be happy to use it. The alparysoft seems best, but it has a logo, but you can trick it in VirtualDub by making the image 800 pixels wide before feeding it to the filter, and then crop it back to 720 wide. I would like to spend more time comparing the area-based to the alpary, and I made a DVD to compare them -- but I want to watch them on a non-HDTV so I have to bring it to my mother's house because I am not sure if my DVD player and HD set are doing any additional processing. |
January 5th, 2004, 03:21 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 267
|
Rob L: ease up on the guy he's doing us a favour! I'm on dialup and if i can download ~210MB no problem i'm sure the rest of the broadband world wont batter an eyelid. :P
Robert, Thanks for putting the clips up and going to the effert of posting. :)
__________________
Welcome... to the real world! |
January 8th, 2004, 02:51 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 64
|
Someone pointed out to me to try these settings in Smart Deinterlace:
denoise on cubic on motion threshold = 5 Once I did these, my artifacts went away, and now I tend to believe this is the best free filter. At least I am going to use it rather than retest them all. |
January 12th, 2004, 08:28 AM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
There is also quite a lot of info about it on his journal page. |
|
| ||||||
|
|