|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 4th, 2008, 10:37 PM | #1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 2,231
|
Questions Regarding the Widescreen Frame
Hello,
I only own 4:3 cameras, so I have not worked much with widescreen footage. For an SD frame, does the widescreen format actually have less pixels than the 4:3 frame? 4:3 is 720x480 16x9 is 720 x405? Also regarding lenses, if my 4:3 lens is 6.4mm to 121mm, and I put that lens on a widescreen camera, does the wide angle coverage stay the same as the 4:3 frame, or does the 6.4mm represent more on a widescreen chip? Or in other words, do the mm markings on lenses represent the same field of view on 4:3 & 16x9 chips? Thanks |
March 4th, 2008, 11:40 PM | #2 |
American Society of Cinematographers
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 123
|
4x3 and 16x9 recordings in SD have the same pixel ratio, just that the pixels are skinnier in 16x9, which is why a 16x9 DVD image looks skinny but full-frame on a 4x3 monitor unless you have the DVD player convert the signal to become 4x3 with a 1.78 letterbox.
But SD cameras may have either 4x3 or 16x9 sensors (most have 4x3 sensors, just as most HD cameras have 16x9 sensors), so some cameras may be cropping a 4x3 sensor to create a 16x9 image, or cropping a 16x9 sensor to create a 4x3 image.
__________________
David Mullen, ASC Los Angeles |
March 5th, 2008, 03:43 AM | #3 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
Quote:
A given lens, for a given nominal chip size, will have a circular coverage. The relevant chips should then sit within that with their corners all on the same circle, if that helps you visualise it. |
|
March 5th, 2008, 04:13 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 352
|
SD 16:9 DV is roughly 853x480.
-A |
March 5th, 2008, 06:45 AM | #5 |
Wrangler
|
True for graphics and other elements with a PAR of 1.0. However, SD video is 720x480 whether it's widescreen or not per the DV spec. For 16:9, the pixel aspect ratio changes via a flag in the video stream that must be interpreted by the equipment displaying it. It's true though that if you are going to display it in a player or medium that doesn't understand that flag, the video must be converted to 853x480 to display properly.
-gb- |
March 5th, 2008, 09:02 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 2,231
|
Thanks for your replies.
So when the DSR-450 says it is widescreen switchable, is it using 4x3 chips and just turning off pixels on the top and bottom to get a 16x9 image? If so, the 16x9 image is actually using less chip area than the 4:3 image. Or much worse, is it using 16x9 chips (the size from above) and turning off the sides to get 4:3. If the 720x480 pixel count is never violated, either way, the chip size of these cameras seems to be smaller than the good old 4:3 2/3" chip if 16x9 is involved. Am I off track here? If I am correct, then it is no surprise that HD cams are limited in low light due to the starting point of a smaller chip than a 4:3 camera. It is like to get performance equal to a 4:3 chip, lens openings need to be enlarged for 16x9/HD to get equal chip real estate. Please tell me if I am wrong. Thanks |
| ||||||
|
|