|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 24th, 2006, 10:14 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 11
|
Tiny squares in exported avi movie
I am using Adobe Premier Pro 2.0 to edit a movie shot with a Canon XL1. It looks great. But, becuase I defined the project as 16:9 but have 4:3 footage (newbie move) I have to export the footage and import into a new project defined as 4:3.
The problem occurs with the exported footage. I am exporting the edited timeline as a movie in AVI format usine Microsoft DV codec. When I look at the exported DV movie (after importing or in a viewer), I notice that every so often I'll see a frame with let's say 4 or 5 small rectangles of different colors randomly space around the frame that seem arbitrary and don't fit in, like video noise. I am not sure where these are coming from or how to stop them. There are not a lot of these frames but I want to get rid of them. I rexported the timeline but I still get this effect but in different frames. Any ideas? |
October 25th, 2006, 10:18 AM | #2 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 11
|
Found the answer
The problem occurred when I used the Microsoft DV Avi codec. This apparently compresses the file and in compression created the issue. I tried the Microsoft Uncompressed Avi codec and did not have the problem after exporting the timeline as an Avi movie. This did however generate a very large file - 80 GB.
|
October 30th, 2006, 01:18 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: istanbul - turkey
Posts: 14
|
I had a very similar problem. I always thought that AVI is uncompressed format that has maximum resolution. When I transfer 1 hour footage to PC the file size was around 12 gb. But now, I understand that there is the codec isue. 12 gb file used microsoft DV codec.
Using After effects I generated an uncompressed AVI file that is 10 times larger than the one with codec. Now I suspect that if I had transfered the shootage uncompressed (if such thing is possible) would it be better quality ? why does it happen with DV codec AVI ? I will also search the forum to find an answer. |
October 30th, 2006, 01:57 PM | #4 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
|
|
October 30th, 2006, 02:03 PM | #5 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
AVI (like QuickTime) is what is known as a container format. It does not under-
stand how data is stored (with the exception of uncompressed). An AVI (or QT) file can hold any data in any format you want as long as you have a codec to encode / decode. This codec decides the quality of the image (or audio you are getting). (Microsoft)DV codec is indeed a DCT based compression codec (1:5) and will introduce compression artificats (although you should not be able to see much of them in the first or second generation). There are a bunch of other codecs to choose from with varying degrees of compression & quality. You can install new codecs as well to expand the selection available (like for example DiVX for output). However, if you truly want to retain quality for intermediate work (ie, not for final output) then you can indeed select none or uncompressed or a lossless (like Zip, doesn't loose any bits) codec (like Sheer). Those files will be (a lot) bigger since it cannot through certain information away to reduce file sizes.
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
October 30th, 2006, 02:16 PM | #6 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: istanbul - turkey
Posts: 14
|
Rob,
then Microsoft DV codec is not Lossless codec. right? The AVI files that I transfer from tape to laptop through firewire has DV codec. (when I right-click the file and check proerties, there I see DV codec) Does that mean that I loose resolution during transfer ? Thanks |
October 30th, 2006, 05:18 PM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 1,447
|
I think you need to check the codec settings.
|
October 30th, 2006, 10:35 PM | #8 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
Are you capturing into Adobe Premier Pro 2.0. If so, did the program recognize your camera when you connected it? |
|
October 31st, 2006, 02:20 AM | #9 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: istanbul - turkey
Posts: 14
|
I checked it with 3 different application. Although none of them is Pro software, I don't think that causes the problem.
While capturing I tried to change settings but all 3 software forced me to use DV codec. 1) Is there any way to capture uncompressed avi from tape to computer ? 2) what is the size (MB) of your 1 minute footage ? (just to compare) 3) When I play the original footage (which has DV codec) through win. media player I notice a great deal of pixel movements. It looks not smooth and as if some of data is loss. But I guess it is a player problem rather than actual data loss. Although there may be a small amount of data loss due to encoding it is not noticable. I believe that if I convert that avi file to DVD format, there will be no annoying pixel movement problem. Sowtware I used : Adobe Premiere Standart v7.0 Ulead Video Studio 8 Windows Movie Maker |
October 31st, 2006, 06:43 AM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 1,447
|
1. The footage on the tape is already in DV. You are merely downloading it, so you gain nothing in quality by converting it to uncompressed afterwards.
2. 60s x 25Mb/s = 187.5MB. Add codec overhead and you are in the neighborhood of 200MB. 3. Interlacing. Try rendering a DVD and watching on T.V. |
October 31st, 2006, 07:33 AM | #11 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: istanbul - turkey
Posts: 14
|
Thanks Emre,
I will try it in the evening. (hopefully before the champs leauge match GS vs PSV) |
October 31st, 2006, 11:23 AM | #12 | |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
Quote:
away). It is a lossy (does through data away) codec. As Emre correctly said, a DV camera already has a DV codec onboard and encodes the video into this format before it lays it down to tape. When you "capture" it you are basically doing a file copy from tape to your computer. So no extra (re)compression is going on. You are getting the best quality you can get (with such a camera). For this reason I really dislike to use the word capture for DV camera's / tape. Everyone associates capturing an analog signal and (lossy) compressing that. I'd rather call it a data transfer or something. Too bad the NLE makers didn't do that. Same goes for P2 media. It's not something you capture. You import or transfer such data.
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
|
March 14th, 2008, 02:32 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Temperance, MI
Posts: 86
|
This may not have much to do with what you were talking about, but I thought I'd pipe in anyway...
I recently formatted my computer, backing up everything I had, beforehand. Among the files that were backed up were some avi clips that hadn't been edited yet. Once I reinstalled everything and placed the avi's back onto the harddrive, the "small square" distortion had invaded these unedited avi's, so that now I will be forced to live with them in the final product. Fortunately, these videos were only a part of our home videos, but frustrating, none-the-less. The files were backed up onto an external drive during format. I'm not sure why this would or could have happened, but it's something I'll be careful about in the future. |
| ||||||
|
|