|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 19th, 2003, 04:11 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 21
|
two fields not in sync?
Could someone please have a look at this image :
http://mysite.mweb.co.za/residents/net03472/index.html It is a jpeg picture the full bitmap image is also availible at 1.2Meg, captured it off a video file using premiere. It seems to occure only when the camera (Canon xl1s) pans. I believe it is caused in the camera, but maybe it could be related to my pc. Could anybody tell me the probabile cause. Thank you Llewellyn |
January 19th, 2003, 06:19 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 343
|
Did you de-interlace the frame before saving? You can do that either in Premiere before saving or with Photoshop after the frame has been extracted from the timeline.
__________________
Ed Frazier |
January 20th, 2003, 05:04 PM | #3 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
That is known as interlacing artifacts. There have been very
lengthy discussion on this board regarding interlacing and I suggest you use the search feature above to find those threads (try searching for: interlaced, interlacing, progressive etc.). The "problem" comes from a difference between your TV and the computer screen. TV's are interlaced and computer monitors are non-interlaced (also known as progressive). What does interlaced mean? Interlaced means that your picture gets divided in two. The first block contains all the even lines (for example) and the second block all the odd lines. These are recorded, transmitted and displayed very fast after eachother. Your eye doesn't really see the difference and sees it as one picture. Since the picture is basically being recorded AT TWO DIFFERENT POINTS IN TIME (very small differences, but still) you can SEE the difference on a computer monitor since it shows you the whole image in one go. Therefor it is more or less incorrectly showing you the two blocks of the image at the same time while it should have been slightly after eachother. This is not a real problem, why? Well, let me explain the methods of distribution: 1) (S)VHS / SVCD / DVD These can be encoded in interlaced and will play back fine on any TV since they natively understand interlaced. If you playback a DVD on your computer your DVD player software will de-interlace the picture on the fly and try to make it look as good as possible 2) VCD / web If you go with any of these formats the resolution will be lowered and one of the blocks will dissapear. Therefor the time difference is gone and you will not see any interlacing artificats. 3) Full resolution computer video Here you might have a problem with viewability. See some suggestions below. If you don't want these interlacing artifacts there are two things to do (depending on what camera you have). If you have a Canon XL1(s) for example you can set it up to record in progressive/frame mode so that it doesn't have the little time differences and therefor those lines. You might also de-interlace your footage after you transfer it to your computer. Most editing applications support this (how good it will turn out might differ greatly!) and there are some special applications/plugins available just for this job. I hope this has explained it a little bit. Some other people will probably chime in to give you their explenations and opinions. Good luck!
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
| ||||||
|
|