|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 6th, 2006, 09:04 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 92
|
two monitors or one
The previous post reminded me of what I wanted to ask.
Beyond personal preference(because I know what I would prefer), are there any pros or cons when building an editing computer with one large widescreen monitor compared to two monitors in a typical setup? |
February 6th, 2006, 09:25 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 1,447
|
I think dual monitors offer more bang for the buck (in terms of size:cost). Of course, dual widescreen is even better... The obvious drawback is that dual monitors consume more power and space.
|
February 6th, 2006, 12:32 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 206
|
Im not sure this is a big factor, but if you only have one graphics card, then dual monitors will split the memory in half, one for each monitor.
__________________
http://wildlookout.com |
February 6th, 2006, 12:40 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 256
|
I use dual 19" monitors because I can get the same amount of screen area for about 1/3 the price of one large monitor. The downside for me is the gap in the middle. Although I am using monitors with thin edges, when I am working on something that is right in the middle it is anoying. If I could afford it I would easily opt for one large monitor.
|
February 6th, 2006, 05:48 PM | #5 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
In my dream situation I would probably have 5. Three "normal" tft screens,
probably a widescreen in the middle with two squrea ones besides it. Timeline in the middle, extra screens like properties, waveforms and vectorscope on the left. Production notes / shot lists and file window (or something) on the right. Then a calibrated studio monitor for those colo(u)rs and the fifth would be a nice digital projection system to see the cuts on the large screen. At least that last part is happening this year. Hey, a man can dream! But back to your original question. Besides the obvious differences there isn't really a technical side. As long as you have the proper graphics card(s) with enough memory. Oh, and I would definitely connect any LCD/TFT screen through DVI (digital), instead of VGA (analog).
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
February 7th, 2006, 10:01 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,048
|
dual monitors
Alden,
I use two ninteen inch monitors, I can also run a tv at the same time to check to make sure color is right Where i teach my students edit with one monitor with adobe and it is just a plain pain in the butt. 38 inches of workspace is perfect!! you will not regret it. I would recomend two flat panels of the same make to make certain they line up nicely. To purchase even a 23inch monitor cost substantially more than two 19's. greater than 19 is beyond the point of diminishing returns. gus |
February 7th, 2006, 11:00 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 92
|
Thanks for the reply gus.
|
February 8th, 2006, 09:31 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellsboro, Pa
Posts: 285
|
I use two 21" Viewsonics for computer desktop space, and a Sony PVM-14M2U for a production monitor.
I don't really care for the dual monitor setup. I had them next to each other, but I got sick of turning my head to see the production monitor, so now I have that in between the two and I find myself hardly ever using my second desktop monitor. I think I'd be much happier with one big widescreen. |
| ||||||
|
|