|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 13th, 2005, 12:41 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 107
|
dual core amd 4200 vs. single 4000
I decided to sacrofise the matrox and stick to AMD chips and have a computer built for me.
now the question is wether to go dual core AMD or single? is reliability, compatibility and etc an issue with the dual cores? if not is it wise to spend the extra $150 and get a dual core 4200 vs. single core 4000? MD 64 4000+ Clawhammer or a AMD 64FX-xx $368 A64 X2 4200+ (2x512,2.2) $473 here are the specs: MotherBoard: FoxConn: supports dual core CPUs supports SLI (2xPCI-express video) PATA & SATA RAIDs (0,1,0+1 JBOD) 2x ATA133 (4 devices) 6x SATA II (6 devices) Audio: 7.1 channel High Definition Dual Ethernet Lan (2x10/100/1000MB) S/PDIF Out 1x Optical and 1x Coaxial 4x USB 2.0 rear supports 2x FireWire Memory: 1GB DDR400 Dual Channel Video Card: Rosewill Geforce 6600 256MB DDR 128-bit DVI, TV out. SLI not supported. Case: 550W Broadway comp. case. Optical dirve: Samsung all DVD+/-RW +DL ($35) Total with shipping for PC & 4000+CPU: FedEx 3-day $848 FedEx 2nd day: $859 FedEx Overnight: $871 |
September 13th, 2005, 02:01 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 1,241
|
Software before hardware... What do your tools recommend as far as dual processors vs single? That is what helps you decide. If you plan on HDV, I suspect that your NLE vendor will eventually recommend a dual, but you should verify that.
|
| ||||||
|
|