|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 2nd, 2010, 02:59 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Reading, PA USA and Athens, Greece
Posts: 269
|
CS5 PC setup/benchmark thread
Well last week i lost my workhorse Q6600 system due to a motherboard failure; so i figured it was time to upgrade. I was running a modified Gateway quad core with a RAID0 project drive, 8GB 1066 RAM, and a 9800GTX+ OC 1GB card. I bought a replacement motherboard that came with a case, so ill be rebuilding the old Q6600 system later for a media center PC.
Might as well post up our system specs and benchmark them; i recommend http://ppbm4.com/Benchmark.html My components are headed in. I stuck with a MicroATX because i dont have a spare ATX shell and i dont want to waste the money. Core i7 950 (to be overclocked to 4ish GhZ) Asus Rampage III Gene (for overclocking) Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600, 12GB (will also be reclocked) 1TB seagate barracuda main drive 500GBx2 RAID0 project drive 9800GTX+ OC 1GB (reuse old card, buy a GTX 480 later) I am considering going with one RAID1 and two RAID0 drives for faster workflow, and another RAID1 for storage. Will benchmark when its assembled. |
December 2nd, 2010, 09:59 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 38
|
I'm just a blue collar man trying to break into hobby video. I wouldn't begin to comprehend that kind of computing power. I'd sure like to see some of these kinds of machines at work.
|
December 3rd, 2010, 08:45 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Reading, PA USA and Athens, Greece
Posts: 269
|
i used to build PC's a few years back, but ive been out of the loop and happy with the machines i had.
Its a LOT easier today with smarter technology versus even 6 years ago when the modding arena was much smaller and required a much deeper knowledge of what you were doing. Today, you can build a system that is capable of overclocking itself safely, and yet provide a noticeable difference in performance (graphics cards and motherboards). I still prefer to customize all my builds, and everything. Heck, i customize my cars, my PC's, my phones, my house, everything i can. Try and find a PC builder with your new system and ask about tweaking it for video editing; i do it for free for any PC we build for clients; doesnt take a whole lot of time. |
December 5th, 2010, 03:47 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
|
My 2 cents on Raid: for source video (which can be re-loaded from backups), Raid 0 isn't a bad idea. However, for project files including Premiere Pro, After Effects, Photoshop, etc... it is smart to use at least Raid 1. Imagine working on a project for 10hrs straight and having a drive die.
|
December 5th, 2010, 07:29 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Reading, PA USA and Athens, Greece
Posts: 269
|
i only utilize the RAID0 configuration for the actual export; OS and CS5 install is on one disk, source material is on a RAID0, and project disk is a RAID0. everything is backed up externally and i save before i export. i usually erase and reconfigured my RAID0 drives every 2-3 weeks to keep them fresh.
In 2-3 months i will build an even faster, 4.2GhZ refridgerated and overclocked Core i7 980X six core with 24GB overclocked RAM, SSD boot disk, RAID10 project disk, RAID10 for the delivery drive, RAID10 for the cache disk, and a GTX480 as the primary export system. we will edit the project on one system, have all media files on BOTH systems, copy the project to the second export machine, and then export on BOTH systems simultaneously that way we have a failsafe export. This workflow will only be used for extremely high priority work (and the clients will pay for it). I would have bought these parts and built it this week and got BOTH new systems tuned, but im waiting for the 980X to drop in price when the new Sandybridge chipsets comes out. I also just bought a 6 speed 370Z with the sport package and NISMO aero package... so my budget is a little stretched :) |
December 7th, 2010, 09:42 PM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
|
|
December 8th, 2010, 11:59 AM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melrose Park, Illinois, USA
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
By the way, CS5 5.0.3 came out yesterday. Unfortunately, there still is no official GTX 480 or Quadro 6000 support for MPE in this release. However, the Quadro 5000M (the lower-power mobile version of the Quadro 5000) is now officially supported for MPE GPU acceleration (and for Mac OSX users, the Quadro 4000 is now officially supported in MPE). The default CUDA Supported Cards file should now look like this if you are running Windows x64: GeForce GTX 285 GeForce GTX 470 Quadro CX Quadro FX 3800 Quadro FX 4800 Quadro FX 5800 Quadro 4000 Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000M If you are using Mac OSX, the supported cards should now be: GeForce GTX 285 Quadro FX 4800 Quadro 4000 |
|
December 8th, 2010, 10:28 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Reading, PA USA and Athens, Greece
Posts: 269
|
absolutely correct; i only found PPB5M yesterday through a link Harm Millard had posted over at adobe forums; though PPB4M does have results with MPE, which had confused me.
i DO recommend benchmarking with PPB5M rather than ver4. I am on my 7 year old laptop (Dell Insprion 5150, XP Pro, 2GB RAM, 1600x1200 UXGA, 3.06 P4 w/HT, 4x DVD-RW, 802.11B, 100GB 7200RPM HDD and SB Audigy 2ZS Notebook; OLDSCHOOL lol!) building my new core i7 machine tonight and prepping for benchmarking. also looking to replace my 9800GTX+ OC 1GB DDR3 (CUDA/MPE hacked) with a GTS240 1GB DDR5 (CUDA/MPE hacked). Never had a problem with it. Still my favorite PC. I could EASILY boot up and post from my dinosaur computer; an 800Mhz Dell Dimension XPS B800r with 512MB RAM and a whopping 30GB and 80GB HDDs, 128MB GeForce 4200Ti, SB Live soundcard, TV Tuner, 56k/100Mbps Ethernet, DVD player and 8x CD burner drives running Windows 98 SE from (1998? 1999? 2000? i dont remember!) Only swapped in more RAM and replaced the 32MB Geforce card with the 4200Ti. |
December 10th, 2010, 07:35 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 38
|
I recall specifically a 800 ghz machine that was my dream machine. 'bout 100 years ago! I 3 years I'll be laughing about the machines we prize right now.
|
December 17th, 2010, 07:50 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Reading, PA USA and Athens, Greece
Posts: 269
|
reconfigured my system. Asus Rampage III Gene. 2x USB 3.0 and 2x SATA III (6 Gb/sec)
Intel X25M 80GB SSD - OS/CS5 install disk BRD-206 blu ray burner, SATA II 2x 80GB Hitachi 7200RPM 2.5" drives in RAID0 SATA II - cache 2x 80GB Hitachi 7200RPM 2.5" drives in RAID0 SATA II - render Corsair C300 SATA III 128GB SSD - cache Corsair C300 SATA III 128GB SSD - render Seagate 1TB USB 3.0 7200 RPM external - storage Seagate 1TB USB 3.0 7200 RPM external - storage Going to test the RAID0 drives against the SATA III SSD's tonight. |
| ||||||
|
|