|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 30th, 2009, 04:32 PM | #16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
So if I understand you correctly, the Intel Xeon W3540 @ 2.93 GHz is the better choice than the Intel Xeon X5560 @ 2.8 GHz, because of the clock speed? I think you ought to explain that rationale to the marketing people at Intel, because they sure don't get it. BTW, neither do I.
|
November 30th, 2009, 06:03 PM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,315
|
Again, you're best going through metrics over time on Tom's Hardware: Hardware News, Tests and Reviews where they do an excellent, much better job of explaining how it all works.
|
November 30th, 2009, 06:15 PM | #18 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
The page you linked to only gives a generic (Home) page, not to what you may have intended and sorry, I'm not going to search for it, especilly not on Tom's Hardware, since they have far too many flawed tests and incorrect statements.
|
March 11th, 2010, 01:16 PM | #19 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 4,100
|
There are a number of "what computer" and "which processor" threads, but this one seemed most directly about the impending Gulftown processor, so I'll mention here that it appears that the NDA's have expired about the 980X:
AnandTech: The Core i7 980X Review: Intel's First 6-Core Desktop CPU Intel Core i7-980X Extreme: Hello, Six-Core Computing : Introduction
__________________
Pete Bauer The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. Albert Einstein Trying to solve a DV mystery? You may find the answer behind the SEARCH function ... or be able to join a discussion already in progress! |
March 13th, 2010, 12:19 AM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Melrose Park, Illinois, USA
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
And I had inaccurately speculated that current X58 motherboards might not be upgradeable to support the hexacore processors. It actually depends on the board revision and the installed BIOS version. (This means that some early X58 motherboards might not be able to support the hexacore processors at all due to their voltage regulator limitations.) So, if I were to upgrade to a hexacore processor, using my current motherboard would be out of the question due to its limited number of DIMM slots. It effectively has only three memory slots, which means that 12GB is the maximum that I can effectively go with this motherboard (maximum for that mobo is theoretically 16GB, but filling up four slots would force the i7 memory controller to operate in a funky hybrid mode of triple- and single-channel, which would increase the overall memory controller latency and therefore reduce performance). I might just keep the quad-core 920 on that mobo and go with something like an Asus P6TD Deluxe for the hexacore. And I would only go hexacore if the price of such a processor falls below $400. |
|
March 15th, 2010, 03:42 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 232
|
Randall, that's why I and others recommended the ASUS P6T platform to you. There's a reason why most of us build on that motherboard.
|
| ||||||
|
|