|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 13th, 2005, 02:20 PM | #1 |
Tourist
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3
|
Cheap minidv cameras for decks
I just bought a DVX100a and I would rather not use it to capture and I don't have $900 to pay for a dv deck, so I was thinking of buying a cheap minidv camera to act as a deck. So I was just wondering if the quality will suffer when using a cheap camera as opposed to my dvx100a or a high quality deck? Anybody have any experiences using cheap cameras to capture?
Thanks |
May 13th, 2005, 02:45 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
Will quality suffer? No.
Lots of people here use cheap cameras to capture. I'd probably get something like an Optura 20 or Panasonic GS70/120/150. Top loading, analog-digital passthrough (if I remember correctly), great bang for the buck in terms of image quality if you need a second camera. There are some new Optura 20s on eBay for around $400 (although eBay can be sketchy sometimes; know what you're doing). 2- AN old Samsung camera I had (SCD55 I think) was fairly unresponsive to deck control (the computer program controlling the camera). It was a pain. I'd avoid Samsung anyways, because their cameras aren't all that great. Presumably their new cameras will have decent deck control? |
May 13th, 2005, 03:05 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Westfield, IN
Posts: 353
|
DVC80 user
Matt,
I shoot with a DVC80 and use my old PV-DV100 as a capture/export deck. No problems at all, but a dedicated deck will rewind and fast-forward more quickly then a camcorder. Also, you can't scrub on a camcorder, but that's not a day-to-day need I have anyway. Find a broken camcorder with dead optics on eBay for $100, and your DVX can rest in its case when not shooting. |
| ||||||
|
|