|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 17th, 2009, 07:05 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Des Plaines, IL
Posts: 10
|
converting AVCHD before editing
I have seem some things online about taking your avchd files and converting to something else before editing that doesnt much affect the quality but makes it faster to edit say using Pinnacle.
Anyone here done that before? If so whaty would you convert it to, MPEG2? AVI? Thanks again for helpin the newguy |
September 17th, 2009, 11:20 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
|
September 17th, 2009, 12:29 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Des Plaines, IL
Posts: 10
|
what am i looking at here?
|
September 17th, 2009, 04:57 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 408
|
Here is your solution.
NewBlue AVCHD Upshift | Batch convert your AVCHD files into standard .M2T files. |
September 19th, 2009, 08:42 AM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Des Plaines, IL
Posts: 10
|
cool so what benefit will that provide?
Faster rendering? Easier editing? Less space used on hard drive? Thanks! |
September 19th, 2009, 08:50 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 408
|
You'll get the benefit of all three. Download trial and give it a spin.
|
September 20th, 2009, 02:23 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 58
|
NeoScene converts AVCHD to 10-bit 4:2:2 avi that is pretty much lossless and perfect for speedy editing, color grading, etc. UpShift converts to MPEG2. I'd recommend Cineform before UpShift if you're planning on editing.
|
September 21st, 2009, 10:02 AM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 1,104
|
I agree, Cineform is a much better choice. MPEG isn't a good format for editing.
|
September 21st, 2009, 10:47 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Deep South, U.S.
Posts: 1,526
|
Tried Cineform Neo Scene trial today on Canon 7d file from dpreview.com. Worked great. Only doubled the file's 44mb size and was fast. Brought the converted file into Edius and it played back fine. Looks like a great solution.
__________________
Mark videos: http://vimeo.com/channels/3523 Stock: http://www.pond5.com/artist/mark29 |
September 21st, 2009, 11:12 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 408
|
Both programs are a good solution. I've used both and was happy with results of each. Both will enable you to take AVCHD and convert to a more easily editable format.
Benefits of Upshift: 1. easily edited with most current systems. 2. faster rendering than AVCHD native. 3. maintains original file sizes(Cineform will use 2x-4x more hard drive space) Benefits of Cineform: 1. easily edited with most current systems 2. faster rendering than AVCHD native. 3. uses 10 bit 4:2:2, which will hold up through post better On the Cineform site, Pinnacle is not listed as a compatible NLE for use with Neoscene. It may work though. |
September 21st, 2009, 11:33 AM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Since when is Cineform (at the Neoscene level) 10bit?
[edit] Just looked at their file spec. Neoscene is indeed 10bit. That's amazing. And a terrific bargain. I use a different system, but this is fabulous for someone looking to go this route on a budget.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
September 21st, 2009, 03:02 PM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 197
|
If you have Sony Vegas you can do a batch conversion to whatever format you like.
Tools > Scripting > Batch Render
__________________
Bored? Check out my blog (shot with Sony EX1, Panasonic TM700, Nikon D7100, Sony NEX-5N, GoPro2): LongLongHoneymoon.com |
September 25th, 2009, 09:33 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta/USA
Posts: 2,515
|
I am shocked... Mark, what's wrong with Canopus HQ???
|
September 26th, 2009, 08:56 AM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
Canopus HQ, all by itself, can justify the cost of Edius Neo. It's a viable alternative to Cineform's codec.
|
September 26th, 2009, 12:51 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 58
|
EDIUS is a really fantastic editor. The only thing I don't like about it is the lack of plugin support. There is an After Effects bridge in beta, though. Once they get that working well I think a lot of people are going to stand up and take notice.
|
| ||||||
|
|