|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 17th, 2005, 06:00 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 125
|
Windows XP home or Pro
Is there a speed difference editing video using Premiere Pro 1.5 on a Windows XP Home or Pro?
__________________
Sincerely, Renat Zarbailov of Innomind.org |
February 17th, 2005, 06:07 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 242
|
No, I believe the only sole difference is the amount of networking capabilities.
__________________
Brandon Greenlee |
February 17th, 2005, 08:54 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Manitowoc Wisconsin
Posts: 77
|
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/p...choosing2.mspx
the only important thing I see is "Scalable processor support – up to two-way multi-processor support." Does your machine have dual prossesors? |
February 17th, 2005, 09:17 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
I don't think Home works with Hyperthreading either (Which is effectively seen as two processors). Anyone confirm this?
Aaron |
February 17th, 2005, 09:25 PM | #5 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 4,100
|
I had thought so, but Glenn C. in this thread said that HOME does support hyperthreading, just not multiple physical processors:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...4&highlight=XP Of course, it also depends on your computer hardware, including processor and motherboard, being hyperthreading-capable.
__________________
Pete Bauer The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. Albert Einstein Trying to solve a DV mystery? You may find the answer behind the SEARCH function ... or be able to join a discussion already in progress! |
February 17th, 2005, 11:31 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
I believe Home supports hyperthreading. I run XP Pro though, so I can't check.
The one useful thing about XP Pro for me is the remote desktop feature. I can remotely connect to my home computer from Ryerson university computers, which do NOT allow you to install ultraVNC (in many ways better, but requires client installation or java-enabled browser). Remote desktop also works better for dual monitors as it won't screw up your icons. Otherwise I don't think XP Pro is a big deal. It lets you have networks >10 computers and has better foreign language support and a few other minor things. It does support dual processors... but who has those? Get a Matrox RTX.100 first. |
February 19th, 2005, 07:37 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Ridgeville, Ohio
Posts: 407
|
I run XP home with hyperthreading.
__________________
Dave |
February 19th, 2005, 10:35 AM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad CA
Posts: 1,132
|
i also run hyperthreading with xp home.
there are issues with logging in as the administrator in xp home, that make it a pia from an admin point of view... specifically, i believe that the administrator account is not as accessible as it is with xp pro, i.e., administrator is not one of the accounts that you can switch to, like you can with xp pro. |
February 19th, 2005, 10:44 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Manitowoc Wisconsin
Posts: 77
|
You can give any account on XP (home or pro) administrator's rights.
If you have an account named "Administrator" on your machine I highly reccomend you rename it; Its step one to hacking your machine. (and of course password protect it, but that goes without saying) |
| ||||||
|
|