Does more RAM = Faster Rendering? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Windows / PC Post Production Solutions > Non-Linear Editing on the PC
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Non-Linear Editing on the PC
Discussing the editing of all formats with Matrox, Pinnacle and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 30th, 2004, 10:04 PM   #1
Major Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Posts: 287
Does more RAM = Faster Rendering?

I recently built a new PC around a Pentium 4 2.8 GHz processor and 1 gig of PC3200 DDR RAM (2x512mb). I have two more slots open for additional RAM. My question is if I add another gig of RAM, should I expect faster rendering when using Premier Pro?

I think I skimped a little on a video card for this system. I have a NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 (64mb) card. Should I be more concerned with upgrading the card instead?

Thanks for your input.
__________________
At full draw,
Tyge Floyd
Tyge Floyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30th, 2004, 11:52 PM   #2
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
It might actually make a few percent difference if you add 2 DIMMs of the exact same model. It might increase memory bandwidth, which speeds up video rendering speed slightly. This is definitely not worth doing though!

Video card- you should be fine, video cards don't affect rendering speeds.

I suppose you could save up for one of those real-time acceleration boards. Or you could do something else while rendering (like sleep).
Glenn Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2004, 12:24 PM   #3
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 114
yeah to get better rendering (more then a couple seconds difference) you'd have to upgrade the CPU, motherboard, and RAM. he video card has nothing to do with rendering the video card simply puts the pixels to the monitor. (but that video card does suck no offense)
Kyle Kauss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2004, 01:23 PM   #4
RED Code Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
Kyle: why would you say a GeForce 4 MX 440 "sucks"? That is
such an "opinion". I'm still running my other edit machine with
a GeForce 2 MX. I even play some games on that machine. It
works fine for me.

The only reason to upgrade your video card is if you are doing
heavy gaming, high-end 3D or CAD work.

So unless he is looking to do either of those he is fine with the
card he is running (there are some other exceptions, but not
much).

1 GB ram is usually more than enough for editing and some
effects work as well. More is usually better (you could also do
longer RAM previews which I personally never do), but above
1 GB I seriously doubt most people would use it.

If you do professional editing for a living more might be more
interesting. Rendering speed depends most heavily on the CPU.
After that memory and harddisk speed (bandwidth reasons)
to my opinion.

You could also go with the new Vegas 5 and setup multiple
machine's in a render farm. That allows you to render your
project with multiple machine's.
__________________

Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com
DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef

Join the DV Challenge | Lady X

Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors
Rob Lohman is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Windows / PC Post Production Solutions > Non-Linear Editing on the PC


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network