|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 15th, 2003, 09:09 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 172
|
Requirements for transferring from Camcorder to PC via firewire
Is a a firewire card the only thing i need to transfer full quality uncompressed video from my dvx100 to my PC? I have premier but unfortunately no separate deck to play DV's, so i'll have to transfer directly to my PC from the camera for now... From my understanding i just need a firewire card (compatible with my OS of course) and a firewire cable from camera to PC and capture using premiere. Right?
Also, other unrelated questions-- Is it possible to change the aspect ratio to true 16:9 through an editing program like premiere, avid or vegas? why or why not? Is it possible to imitate popular filters like polarizers in editing programs? Thanks! |
August 15th, 2003, 10:12 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
Dan, a firewire card and cable is all you would need to transfer the footage, using your camera as a playback deck. Remember though, it is still compressed. DV is a compressed format, you can't do anything about that.
Cheers Aaron |
August 16th, 2003, 04:15 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 172
|
thanks for the response. I'm still trying to figure out how DV works... can anyone give me answers for the remaining questions? Thanks!
|
August 16th, 2003, 08:05 PM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
Right about capturing from the camera.
You cannot simulate a polarizer very well as you cannot filter video to look through glare on a windshield. You can emulate the polarizer's effect on color (like the sky) although it is difficult to limit the effect to just the sky rather than all the image as does the polarizer does very well.
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
August 17th, 2003, 02:25 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 172
|
how about other filters?
|
August 17th, 2003, 06:11 PM | #6 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
Soft focus, pro-mist and the others can be simulated with filters. ON-camera filters are obviously quicker if you don't have RT editing but then you are stuck with original footage that has been filtered.
Soft focus, etc., are all easy to do in post.
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
August 18th, 2003, 08:24 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 172
|
awsome! This website rocks!
|
August 18th, 2003, 08:38 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
Premiere is cheaper if you buy it with a certain capture card.
|
August 18th, 2003, 08:47 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
---
Also, other unrelated questions-- Is it possible to change the aspect ratio to true 16:9 through an editing program like premiere, avid or vegas? why or why not? Is it possible to imitate popular filters like polarizers in editing programs? Thanks! --- I'm pretty sure premiere, vegas, and avid will allow you to convert 4:3 movies to 16:9 (vegas does for sure). The resizing algorithms are probably not that good. Photoshop with Genuine Fractals might give you better results. There are some other ways to do it. The term for it is ARC (aspect ratio correction). |
August 18th, 2003, 09:16 PM | #10 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,933
|
New questions unrelated to the original query should be granted their own threads, just to help keep things organized. Thanks.
__________________
All the best, Robert K S Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | The best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
| ||||||
|
|