|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 4th, 2007, 09:57 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Money is no object editing PC
I know these exist all over the place but I cannot find one that seems to align to what I'm looking for.
Specifically, I'm lucky enough to have won an amount of money that will easily cover the cost of a new computer and then some. So here's what I'm considering using to run CS3 + Prospect HD & After Effects (and probably not much else) to edit HQ 1920x1080 footage from the new Sony PMW-EX1. M/B: Asus Blitz-Extreme Processor: Intel Conroe (Quad Core) Q6700 RAM: 2Gb 1066Mhz DDR2 RAM Video Card: Asus 512MB 8600GT I already own the HDDs and I'm decided on the Video Card so I just want feedback on my motherboard, processor and RAM choices. Am I way off? People are still telling me to consider Xeons, but others say no way. If I wait 2 weeks will I be able to get an 8 core processor? Also, does the brand of RAM matter? Finally, as for the case, I don't care what it looks like but I'd prefer quiet, as well as an in-built power supply that would suit all of the above, as well as a HD-DVD drive, Blu-Ray Drive, System HDD, 3 RAID 0 drives & 2 Video Cards. Any advice? Thanks all for your assistance! |
November 4th, 2007, 10:06 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
|
NO money limits? Buy an Avid Media Composer Adrenaline.
|
November 4th, 2007, 10:13 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Well, I won't say NO money limits, but I'm also not going to go over the top for no reason.
I like CS3 and want to stay with it and I don't want the best just for the sake of having the best - I want the most capable for my purpose, which is CS3. That system is aimed way higher than the workflows I'll ever reach. |
November 4th, 2007, 12:00 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
I would do a number of things differently. First off, consider budgeting for an AJA Xena card so you can get Hardware output of the timeline, and not rely on the second port of the graphics card. It will open up many other options as well. Currently AJA cards are the only ones supported by Prospect for preview.
For the Video Card, be aware that Nvidia limited the Video Overlay features in the Geforce8 Series, so if you don't get a Xena card, you want make sure you get the best Geforce7 card you can (probably 7950GT). If you get a Xena, that won't be an issue, so the recently released 8800GT will be the best option for you. (Faster, coolest running 8 series) Get 4GB of RAM, no question. Brand shouldn't matter as much, but get a speed that is a linked you your FSB. The 1066 memory will be good for that CPU,as long as your MB supports it, which the ASUS does. For the Xeon question, if money was NO OBJECT, then Xeon's for sure. For putting reasonable limits on, it just depends on how much of a power user you are. Will you switch over to work in AE while your PPro timeline is rendering, etc. I run 4 CS3 apps at once, and benefit from double as many cores. Waiting two weeks should lower Intel prices all the way around, if purchasing the new CPUs OR the old ones. The new ones will run cooler and more efficient, but won't be durastically faster.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 4th, 2007, 07:21 PM | #5 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Quote:
What's the difference between all these: Intel Xeon - 3000 Series Intel Xeon Quad Core Intel Xeon Socket 604 Is Quad Core the obvious best choice? I also don't know a thing about which motherboard to look at for them. Do they need server motherboards or will they fit on any 775 socket intel board? Thanks for your help, -- John. |
||
November 4th, 2007, 08:49 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 192
|
Hi John
I would suggest you look at the Matrox range of products - RTX2 or Axio. They extend the realtime capabilities of CS3 and provide various outputs for broadcast monitors. I've just ordered an Axio LE following an impressive demo... Hope this helps |
November 4th, 2007, 10:14 PM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
I have no problem with my dual graphics card setup at the moment. I have dual 22" monitors to spread CS3 across and a 24" HD for the full screen video preview and I have zero problems diosplay wise. What I want is a PC optimized for working with the PMW-EX1's HQ 1920x1080 footage in CS3 with Prospect HD. I can do that without those display adapters, nice as they might be, so I don't want to spend for the sake of spending, I just want to tailor a PC to my specific needs. |
|
November 5th, 2007, 02:06 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
The Xeon 3000 series is a renamed Core2 Quad, with few true advantages I am aware of. Might be work an extra $50 to know your CPU was one of the best off the production line. Xeon 3000 series chips use regular 775 sockets. The AJA would offer 10 bit monitoring, and SDI I/O, but if all you are doing with it is monitoring the timeline on an LCD, then the graphics card solution should be fine. From what I have heard, that feature is limited in Geforce8 chips, so don't say you weren't warned if it doesn't work. The 7950GT would be a safer bet if you can find one. The Axio LE would not be very compatible with the Cineform workflow, offer you one advantage. Axio systems can edit XDCam files natively, but I am not sure how the new EX format will work. With Axio, realtime means REALTIME, as in every supported effect plays back in realtime with absolutely no preview rendering. You will have to really commit to the AXIO solution to use it though. They are picky about hardware, etc. I would say that AXIO is faster than Cineform, but Cineform usually offers higher quality compression and output, plus it scales to compressed 10bit and 2K if desired, and is much cheaper.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
|
November 5th, 2007, 08:26 PM | #9 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Quote:
Here's the one I'm looking at: Intel Xeon X3230 Quad Core - 2.66GHz, 8MB Cache, LGA775, Active Cooling There are faster ones which will hopefully come down in price between now and when I purchase so I could end up with a 3GHz one instead (hopefully). Is that the right choice? Quote:
Thanks very much for your help, -- John. |
|||
November 5th, 2007, 11:30 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
I wouldn't sweat the Ram speed, I am considering the Abit board for my new build.
I mean that if money was no object DUAL Xeons for sure, with a worksation class system. At least twice the price. The "new ones" are the new 45nm CPUs Intel is beginning to release next week. Not necessarily faster, but more efficient. (No real increase in clock speed, possibly thanks to no real competition from AMD)
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 5th, 2007, 11:59 PM | #11 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You say you're looking at the ABIT board - what processor and RAM are you looking at to go with it? |
|||
November 6th, 2007, 12:32 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
The speeds are going up all the time, but those products are targeted toward gamers. Compare the speeds of professional workstations. DDR800 should be sufficient.
Many CPUs come off the same line, and are given speeds after testing to see whaich ones perform better. Xeons and Core2 Extremes theoretically should be where the best CPUs off the production line get directed. No significant difference between a Xeon 3000 and a Core2 Quad. New everything, but over the next few months. Core2 Quad Extreme and Xeon5400 series first, next week. Then the rest of the desktop Core2s in about two months, and then Quad Core2 mobile CPUs in about another 2 months. (Estimated) I will buy DDR800, whatever is cheap from a company I at least recognize, and a quad core 2.4Ghz CPU, unless prices drop a lot next week, then I will be at 2.66 or 3.0Ghz. I am hoping Nvidia releases a new chipset this month, so my motherboard research may bo out the window.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 6th, 2007, 01:52 AM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Could I ask you to keep me updated in this thread about your choices, particularly with motherboard - it's one area that I feel I'm way behind with. |
|
November 6th, 2007, 02:21 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
I read somewhere recently that nvidia is supposed to release a new chipset soon, for the new CPUs. I am looking forward to PCIe 2.0 among other things. A new chipset will totally change the motherboard options, and will probably offer the faster Ram you are looking for. I am interested in Nvidia due to the SLI possibility as well as to test out there nTune software for optimizing performance.
When I buy a system, I will definitely post my selection choices on my website.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 6th, 2007, 02:32 AM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Thanks! I hope that if that's the case, that my current graphics cards work in the new motherboard - I don't particularly want to have to upgrade those too. |
|
| ||||||
|
|