November 8th, 2007, 04:31 PM | #31 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
I think I'll end up with a single Quad Core (don't know whether Xeon or not). You said that a single Quad Core would be sufficient but would it run nicely or would it limp at times under the pressure of Magic Bullet and 1920x1080 footage. |
|
November 8th, 2007, 07:51 PM | #32 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
Depends on what you are doing with Magic Bullet. The original MB will never be realtime, but that was for converting NTSC to 24p. If you mean CCR work with looks or colorista, that will primarily be a function of the graphics card I believe. A Geforce 8800 will be the best option, I reccommend a GT (Unless you need fullscreen video overlay support)
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 9th, 2007, 08:55 AM | #33 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
As for needing the full screen video overlay, CS3 can force the full screen video preview regardless of the nVidia settings. When I installed the drivers for my 8600 GT they removed the full screen overlay function from the nVidia control panel but CS3 can still do it without a hitch. |
|
November 9th, 2007, 02:01 PM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
Posts: 517
|
Interesting, not everyone has the same experience with the GeForce8 series. I believe it is confirmed not to work with Prospect full screen overlay in Premiere, but you are indicating that it can still work in desktop mode. I will have to check more, now that I got my 8800GTX back.
__________________
For more information on these topics, check out my tech website at www.hd4pc.com |
November 9th, 2007, 06:47 PM | #35 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
|
|
November 9th, 2007, 09:59 PM | #36 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
See if either of these two links help at all:
http://www.videoguys.com/DIY5updateNAB07.html http://www.guygraphics.com/GGSUBCAT-...28NLEs%29.html |
November 13th, 2007, 09:39 PM | #37 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Also, I read today that if you have a motherboard with two separate processors you must have two copies of windows - one for each processor. Is that correct? |
|
November 14th, 2007, 04:11 AM | #38 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Not as far as I know.
|
November 14th, 2007, 07:59 AM | #39 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Heavens no - but you do need a sufficiently recent version of Windows to make the best use of multiple processors and multi-core processors. Windows XP Pro should be sufficient.
|
November 15th, 2007, 06:03 AM | #40 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Just found what appears to be this motherboard here though it doesn't have the "plus" at the end, which I cannot find anywhere in this country.
Anyway, on the website it says that this motherboard will only support 2 x quad xeons to a maximum speed of 2.66GHz. Is this true? I cannot find ANY reliable sources or sites that can direct me with any confidence to the correct answers to these sorts of questions. I cannot for the life of me decide which of the 3GHz Xeons or Core2Quads is the best nor can I figure out which Motherboard suits which! It's ridiculous! |
November 15th, 2007, 06:27 AM | #41 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
John,
Since my first post in this thread, things have changed again. Intel has announced the availability of Harpertown, a Xeon based on 45 nm technology, better performance, SSE4 extensions, lower TDP and attractive pricing. Since I am still awaiting the final order for a new system, I have decided to go for the new Harpertown/Seaburg combination: CPU: Intel X5472 3.0 GHz, Quad core with 1600 FSB, 80 W TDP Mobo: Supermicro X7DWA-N Chassis: Supermicro SC743TQ-865B Details can be found here: http://supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon1333/ Initial price indications are not much different than my previous suggestions. I don't know whether you are located in NZ or AU, but here are the links to distributors in both countries: NZ: http://supermicro.com/wheretobuy/others.cfm?rgn=154 AU: http://supermicro.com/wheretobuy/others.cfm?rgn=153 Hope this helps. |
November 15th, 2007, 07:00 AM | #42 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
Interestingly, the X5472 Xeon does not seem to be available over here either! I can find the X5450 (which is also 3.00GHz & the X5460 which is 3.16GHz) but not the one you've listed. So at this stage I cannot get any indication of prices for that processor, nor the motherboard or chassis. I'll make some calls during business hours tomorrow and see what I can accomplish. Though I suspect that, as with pretty much everything in this country, they'll be vastly over-priced. As I understand it, the case/chassis makes zero difference to the system, right? Provided that it actually fits and has an adequate power supply? I have a couple other questions also: Are you getting two of those processors or just one? RAM is another thing that confuses me. There's so many numbers in every stick of RAM's model number that I just cannot figure them out. What RAM are you picking up? Is this RAID controller any good? It's nice and cheap compared to others. I probably only want RAID 0. It's called Adaptec Raid 2420 SA/256 SGL PCIE 4 Port SATA. Also, do you plan on running Vista or XP Pro? And which NLE do you use? |
|
November 15th, 2007, 08:54 AM | #43 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Overijse, Belgium
Posts: 28
|
I recently built a new WS for my needs and went through same considerations. I decided for
-Core 2 Quad Processor Q6600 2.4 Ghz 1066mhz Fsb 8mb L2 Lga 775 -> good if working with several tools at same time; -Nvidia Quadro Fx1500 256mb Gddr3 Pci-express 2xdvi+hd-out Graphics Board -> needed for OpenGL hardware rendering; -Motherboard Socket775 Intel P35 + Ich9r 2pci 3pci-ex 2pci-ex16 4ddr-lll 8gb 8 Sata 12usb -> supports DDR3. This hardware works pretty well for me. Margus |
November 15th, 2007, 09:31 AM | #44 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,832
|
Quote:
I am not familiar with the Adaptec controller, but from comparison with the 2410 it looks like it is only a PCI-X card, not PCI-e and does not use a very advanced chip like the IOP341. Neither does it have cache extension capabilities. In general Adaptec is not top-of-the-bill, in price and performance. Areca is the absolute leader in raid controllers. Here is an overview of the new Penryn processors introduced earlier this week. |
|
November 15th, 2007, 05:28 PM | #45 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
How about the Areca RC-1210 4 Port SATA-II RAID Controller - PCI-Ex8
Supports RAID 0,1,0+1,3,5 & JBOD 128MB cache, Standard & Low Profile Mounting Brackets Included? It's only got 4 ports (which is as many as I'll ever need and only got a 128MB cache. In your post on page 2 of this thread you said the 1231ML controller had a 2GB cache. Is that correct? I can only find ones with 256MB cache. Anyhow, I'm also running CS3 Production Premium on XP Pro so it looks like we have the same needs. Thank you so much for helping me out. I'm about to make some phone calls to see what I can find out! |
| ||||||
|
|