|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 1st, 2006, 12:57 PM | #61 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles - California
Posts: 114
|
WOW. very nice, you had to be patient to get that close to the grasshopper..!
Yeah, I totally agree with you, some of the reviews made the camera sound pretty terrible. As it is... the results I have seen have been much better than suggested by the reviews.! Bo www.bophoto.com/HDV |
July 1st, 2006, 01:19 PM | #62 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3
|
Samples, macro
Thanks - hardest part is getting focus.
Just got back from San Juan...got some good Lizard shots. Will combine to make nice movie..but here are just a few sample shots to see the incredible detail... http://files.filefront.com/Grasshopp.../fileinfo.html |
July 1st, 2006, 01:27 PM | #63 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles - California
Posts: 114
|
Gary,
I think to me the most impressive part when talking about resolution, is in the very first part of the second sample you uploaded, behind the grasshopper there is a piece of spider web... its sooo thin and still rendered beautifully... It looks like you are using the anti-shake on some of the shots..? Bo www.bophoto.com/HDV |
July 1st, 2006, 06:06 PM | #64 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3
|
Yes I used anti-shake...all but the grasshopper were handheld. I know from reading previous posts that best results are from anti-shake off. Sometimes I forget....
|
July 1st, 2006, 06:20 PM | #65 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles - California
Posts: 114
|
Anti shake is not always so bad.
Yeah technically speaking it is better with the anti shake off. but I have found it to be very helpful, when I hold the camera with two hands, I support the monitor with the left hand to keep it level and do by tilting by the elbow joints and panning by turning my body, this give me a very steady platform and adding the anti shake to this really do eliminate the small vibrations for a very steady final image. the boxing on my site were shot that way.
Bo www.bophoto.com/HDV |
July 3rd, 2006, 02:07 PM | #66 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
If you have ffdshow installed, it can do it too. |
|
July 5th, 2006, 01:55 AM | #67 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 8
|
Greetings
I just wanted to say hello to all and thanks for the info on this camera. I work at a public access television station and have been waiting for a camera of this resolution and price to come along. I have shot on panasonic dvx-100's and Canon xl-1s. I imported the footage Carlos had available, 37 shots avi, into Vegas, exported it as an mpeg 2 and burned it to dvd. I never got this quality resloution for a regular tv signal from either of the above mentioned cameras. The progressive scan is true as well. Beautiful motion and detail. My only question is, did Carlos really use a Sanyo hd-1? Just kidding. All of the footage posted looks great! I am planning on buying at least 2 of these cameras. I do multi cam shoots alot and for the price, this camera is awesome! Thanks also to Bo for the links for mp4toavi and the player link as well. The reason I think this camera got a bad review by many is that there was no extensive effort to handle the mpeg4 files this camera captures correctly by the reviewers. Thanks again,
Arlan |
July 5th, 2006, 02:00 AM | #68 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 8
|
oh yeah
It would be cool if there was a dedicated Sanyo hd-1 user group site. I know its work and I don't want to belittle DVi, but none the less, it would be cool.
|
July 5th, 2006, 01:49 PM | #69 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles - California
Posts: 114
|
Firewoorks
Brought the camera out last night for the 4th of July firewooks show across the street and learned that the build in microphone is NOT able to handle the pop's
http://eyespot.com/blogs/Bo Bo www.bophoto.com/HDV |
July 5th, 2006, 11:54 PM | #70 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,762
|
I started a thread where people can record their serial numbers, and problems that seem to be fixed on their cameras. To track manufacture fixes Sanyo might implement over time.
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...913#post507913 |
July 8th, 2006, 08:22 PM | #71 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 5
|
Remembering July 7th bombings in London
I've posted some footage up of London during the 2min silence for those who lost there lives in the July 7th bombings last year. I used a 5cm tripod between my legs so its not great but worth checking out if your interested in the quality of the camera on a cloudy day.
http://www.archive.org/details/LondonJuly7th2006 - no signup needed or nagscreens. I highly suggest people use Archive.org for storage HD footage, because it costs nothing and will be there for ever. |
July 9th, 2006, 10:03 PM | #72 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,762
|
Thanks for the tip, do they allow you to change or remove footage if you want to?
|
July 10th, 2006, 02:37 AM | #73 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 5
|
I'm not sure, actually.
|
August 3rd, 2006, 06:32 AM | #74 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hungary / Europe
Posts: 128
|
HD1 640*480 60fps
hi,
in HD1 640*480 60fps is 60 progressive frames or 30 interlaced ? anybody please send one short ( 2-3 sec movement theme ) HD1 640*480 60fps uncompressed mp4 video... thx ! Robert |
August 4th, 2006, 10:14 AM | #75 |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 7
|
HD1 640*480 60fps is 60 progressive frames
|
| ||||||
|
|