|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 17th, 2012, 11:22 AM | #31 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Re: Crocolis HD
Well here's proof that my Extreme cam's waterproof - at least down to 2 metres. These three minutes were snipped out of about 30. Shot mainly in 720/50p for the greatest wide-angle (172 deg in air, so very nearly a FFFE - full frame fish eye).
The cam struggles in low light, and under water you must lose another 1½ stops or so. Footage looked underexposed and the GoPro did better in the same conditions. The 7.8mbps is borderline for fast action as you'll see. It's so-so hi-def, but clicking the 720 or 1080 buttons may make it look better your end. The Well Done Team.mpg - YouTube tom. |
January 27th, 2012, 08:38 AM | #32 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Re: Crocolis HD
Just done a quick test between the Extreme cam and the Canon 60D with the Tokina 11 - 16 mm fitted. Shooting from the same position I notice both field of views are almost identical (apart from the barrel distortion, natch).
|
March 2nd, 2012, 06:33 AM | #33 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Re: Crocolis HD
Another 3½ mins to show the Extreme cam's waterproof. This time I shot at 1440x1080/25p (for the best performance in low light) and bumped the EV by +1 stop in the menu because of shooting into the blue LED lighting. As the pool's a bit shallow I might have been better off using the 720/25p setting to get the wider field of view, but the low 5.6 mbps bit rate at that setting puts me off somewhat.
Tom & Sarah swim.m2t - YouTube tom. |
April 24th, 2012, 03:17 AM | #34 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Re: Crocolis HD
I used the Extreme cam under water again this week. I wanted the best low light performance (the pool's hardly bright) and the widest field of view (the pool's hardly deep), so I set the camera to 720/25p. The resulting footage (action swimmer) is horribly staccato, but a plus point is that every frame is sharp so stills are easily lifted from the timeline. To restore fluidity to the finished film I simply imported the cam's footage into a 1280x720/50i timeline and let the computer invent the in-between frames.
|
April 24th, 2012, 06:25 AM | #35 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Salisbury Maryland
Posts: 161
|
Re: Crocolis HD
...compared to the average kiddy pool video this is very artistic. The blue lighting and bubbles add somewhat of a SloMo effect where the rest of the image is in realtime - like swimming in gelatin. Cool.
Jim |
May 3rd, 2012, 07:56 AM | #36 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Re: Crocolis HD
The Extreme cam is much more light-sensitive in its 25p modes but action footage can look a bit jerky and staccato at this low frame rate. So with this little 5 min film I shot at 1440x1080/25p and used +1 EV for the shots looking up from the bottom. Poolside shots were done mostly using a Panasonic SD900, the 20x zoom contrasting nicely with the Extreme cam's fixed super-wide.
I pulled all the footage into a 50' Edius timeline and let Edius 'invent' the in-between frames. It's smoothed the film out nicely. tom. |
May 21st, 2012, 01:13 PM | #37 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 23
|
Crocolis HD ISSUE
Just wondered if anyone has seen this problem. I'm thinking it's a rolling shutter issue but not sure if the Croc is using a CMOS chip.
CROCOLIS HD CAM ISSUE - YouTube |
May 21st, 2012, 06:39 PM | #38 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 319
|
Re: Crocolis HD ISSUE
Quote:
|
|
May 21st, 2012, 07:39 PM | #39 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 23
|
Re: Crocolis HD
You nailed it...Thanks!
|
| ||||||
|
|