|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 10th, 2005, 05:29 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 41
|
mini DVCAM tape in an XL2?
Does anyone have any info on if using miniDVCAM tape in the XL2 is better than using regular miniDV tape?
thanks a bunch! |
June 10th, 2005, 05:38 PM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
As I understand, the DVCAM tapes are basically the same but have tighter quality control and better shells. They should work fine, but of course will cost more.
|
June 14th, 2005, 02:37 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bjelovar, Croatia
Posts: 153
|
I'm working a lot with PDVM-40N tapes on XM2, and never experienced a dropout even after few reusages.
__________________
XM2 Sony DXC637P BetaSP |
June 15th, 2005, 01:46 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 41
|
Yeah, I know about the cost - though think the benefits may be worth it (maybe?)
One thing I heard was that the mini DVCAM tape was more "stable" -- whatever that means -- less dropout like Darko said. Just wondering if there are any "official" tests out there. Hmm. |
June 15th, 2005, 02:30 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I've used hundreds of hours of DVCAM tapes and never had a dropout. Most have been with a DSR500WS, and some with a DSR250 and even a TRV900. The tape is the cheapest thing on a shoot, so it makes sense to use the best you can get. However, if you switch brands, be sure to use your head cleaning tape first, and use it exactly according to the instructions.
|
June 17th, 2005, 08:31 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 41
|
Great. How about image quality difference? Is there a difference between consumer miniDV and miniDVCAM?
Thanks again! Tracy |
June 17th, 2005, 08:36 AM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
No. Whatever tape you use, the image will be the same. The difference is in fewer dropouts, resistance to stretch, probably increased longevity. And, they come in cool boxes.
|
June 17th, 2005, 09:05 AM | #8 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Quote:
http://digitalmastertape.com/index.asp http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=364848&is=REG |
|
June 17th, 2005, 09:29 AM | #9 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
And I would if I could get anybody from Sony to tell me they're better than DVCAM tapes. Our supplier thinks they're DVCAM tape repackaged, and if you read the promotional material, they never say anything about DVCAM, only about how much better they are than ordinary DV tapes. Using the best tape available means using the best tape, but it doesn't mean paying for marketing hype. I could be wrong--if they're shown to be better, I'd go for them. Even at their increased cost, DV/DVCAM/DVCPRO tape is still cheap. It wasn't all that long ago I was paying 30 bucks for a 30 minute Betacam SP tape. Now I pay a little more than that for a 3 hour DVCAM tape.
|
June 20th, 2005, 03:05 PM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|