|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 23rd, 2005, 11:31 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: london / bournemouth
Posts: 22
|
(dv cam) ...
im still pretty new to cameras and stuff, apologise for stupid questions
i noticed that when colour correcting mini dv footage in certain ways, sometimes the compression can become quite apparent i know dv cam is pretty similar to mini dv apart from the dot pitch or whatever its called, but is the compression noticably diferent? many thanks, alex |
March 23rd, 2005, 11:50 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 704
|
"i know dv cam is pretty similar to mini dv apart from the dot pitch or whatever its called, but is the compression noticably diferent?"
Track pitch :) As far as compression goes, DV and DVCam use the same exact compression. In terms of image quality there is absolutely no difference between the two. Check out Adam Wilt's DV FAQ for some more info.
__________________
Luis Caffesse Pitch Productions Austin, Texas |
March 28th, 2005, 05:25 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: McLean, VA United States
Posts: 749
|
It's probably not the compression so much as the arithmetic with which the color correction is done. If you make large gamma corrections and then apply other filters in a system that uses integer arithmetic "posterization" is likely to result. The best programs do all the math in floating point, cost lots more and take longer to render but give better looking results.
|
March 29th, 2005, 04:35 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 471
|
There is NO DIFFERENCE. No different algorithms, no different chroma sampling -- it is the same video codec. The tape moves faster through the device, there is a slightly different audio sampling method & the data track allows for addressable bits.
DV, DVCam, DVCPro & Digital 8 all use identical video DV25 encoding. GB |
| ||||||
|
|