June 5th, 2007, 03:39 PM | #526 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 565
|
Does this mean that you don't use the same camcorder to output to PC? In other words, you use a professional or semipro camera to film and then take the tape out and use a cheap mini-dv camera to output? Is it OK?
Stelios I use a Canon xl-2 to shoot and I capture from and edit to a cheaper mini dv camera. I never playback anything from my XL-2. I haven't had any issues yet and have done a lot of projects this way. Saved me $$$ on buying a $1000 + deck. I plan on buying one eventually, but I'm a firm believer in if it works then don't fix it. |
June 5th, 2007, 04:15 PM | #527 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
I'm getting ready to sell my DSR-30 DV deck--if anyone is interested, please make me a reasonable offer.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
June 5th, 2007, 09:00 PM | #528 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nicosia, CYPRUS
Posts: 1,080
|
Quote:
Stelios
__________________
My Blog: http://steliosc.blogspot.com "I hope for nothing, I fear nothing, I am free" Nikos Kazantzakis |
|
June 5th, 2007, 11:15 PM | #529 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Deck is probably 6-7 years old at this point. It's been used for my projects but not daily. Works flawlessly. No dropouts, no problems. It's a tank. Full rack size, very solid. Has integrated jog/shuttle on the control tray and remote. I also have a DSR-20 deck and I don't need both any more. The 20 is more portable so I'm keeping that one.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
June 6th, 2007, 05:09 AM | #530 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Andover, Ma
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
Once the video is recorded on the MiniDV tape, it doesn't make any difference between taking it out using expensive deck and taking out using a cheap MiniDV camcorder. Because it's already digital binary signal on the tape. Just like you have a file on your expensive computer, then you copy this file to a cheap computer, it's still the same file! That is the advantage of the digital nature..... |
|
June 6th, 2007, 09:10 AM | #531 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,689
|
Juni, that is only true in theory, not practice. A deck will be faster at getting to in and out points (you can save a lot of time if you log extensively), a deck will have less trouble going from brand to brand of tapes, a deck will have less drop outs, etc. There are many advantages to having a deck...
ash =o) |
June 6th, 2007, 09:17 AM | #532 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Andover, Ma
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
|
|
June 6th, 2007, 10:47 AM | #533 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 621
|
Look around for a used Panasonic AG-DV1000. They're great units, built like a tank, have timecode display up front, and lots of input/output options. Mine was $800 new, but I bet you can find one in good shape for half that.
Only downside is that they are mini-DV only, not the full-size cassettes. |
June 6th, 2007, 10:49 AM | #534 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wurzburg, Germany
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
With a cheap drive you get more errors in the first place and, when the tape degrades, you will more quickly experience visible errors because when too much errors are adding up then the correction and concealment mechanisms won't work anymore. |
|
June 6th, 2007, 05:07 PM | #535 | |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,689
|
Quote:
ash =o) |
|
June 6th, 2007, 06:24 PM | #536 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Andover, Ma
Posts: 102
|
I once talked to an electrical engineer who happens to be in this field. He says that DV read and write mechanism is so mature that modern DV cameras hardly make any errors. Even a low end camera can handle data read/write (on digital tape) transfer very well. That was like 2 years ago, I have never confirmed from an official source what he said however. Thru my own testing, i just believe that coz I have never had any visible errors using cheap camcorder to upload or even download, although I do have a deck.....
|
June 7th, 2007, 10:09 PM | #537 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,689
|
Juni, some tapes can be problematic and decks are more forgiving, i bet everyone on the forum has a story that could back that up. It is rare to have tape issues in general but a deck just is more robust and reduces problems even more.
ash =o) |
June 30th, 2007, 02:44 PM | #538 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 25
|
Guys, this thread was exactly what I needed to hear. I am going to have to get a cheap miniDV camera to deck for me. When I get a promotion or win the lottery I would love to get the dedicated deck.
Is switching from one brand of camera to another an issue. I shoot on a Sony VX2000 but I am going to deck with a Canon ZR600 (gotta good deal <$100)? |
June 30th, 2007, 05:23 PM | #539 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
|
JOE
Switching brands of playback machines is not a problem, it's switching tape formulations that can cause gunk-up. I shoot with an XL2 and use a Sony DSR 11 for playback/capture. No probs. Having said that - further down the road, there are SOME formats of HDV that are brand specific. For instance Canon's 24f. No deck will play it back. You need a Canon Camera to do this. |
July 7th, 2007, 08:28 PM | #540 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 86
|
More info here as well
|
| ||||||
|
|