October 27th, 2004, 03:26 PM | #331 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bjelovar, Croatia
Posts: 153
|
There is no loss of quality when transferring from "el cheapo" at all. I also transferred some DVCAM recordings from Sony DSR370 without any problem or degradation in quality. It's either 0 or 1 and that's nice thing about digital video :-)
__________________
XM2 Sony DXC637P BetaSP |
October 27th, 2004, 06:05 PM | #332 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 10
|
Post editing
Do you use Premiere pro 1.5? I do.
I usually capture whole tape to computer and make many short clips. In this way, I do not use much Camera while editing except exporting the final product to tape. Is this the righjt way to do it? What's the benefit having a deck other than saving Camera head?
__________________
PJ |
October 27th, 2004, 06:09 PM | #333 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
|
Depending on the deck and in addition to more robust heads, there is a stronger faster transport mechanism, more accurate for digital cuts, time code controll, dv/analog transcoding/pal/secam conversion, capacity for larger tapes (The DSR 11 for instance allows you to use the larger DVCAM tapes and format.... and other goodies.
|
October 28th, 2004, 07:46 AM | #334 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
the dsr 11 is a nice lil (oops little) unit i have to agree.. i jsut feel that the decks themselves are overpriced..
Paul, send me an email with ur fone number and ill give u call when i get it.. i mwaiting on sony to deliver the bugger, theyre being very slack with their gear lately and im not happy.. |
October 28th, 2004, 05:24 PM | #335 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad CA
Posts: 1,132
|
i have a sony gv-d900, and based on my experiences, i would not recommend it to anybody... it's a pile of junk.
the buttons don't work like they should most of the time, and the tape often has to be re-inserted multiple times because of some bastard error message... sometimes i'll end up having to literally unplug the power supply from the wall before the deck will accept a tape. and you can't fully turn off the power to the deck... if it's plugged in to the power supply, it's live, even with the power switch turned off, hence the need to unplug the power supply to get a cold boot of the deck. it has also required multiple head cleanings, despite having less hours on it than my xl-1s does... fortunately i'm a tech, so i know how to clean vcr heads. you can buy several el cheapo dv cameras for the cost of this deck, and if you get an extended warranty, you'll be able to get 'em repaired for nothing. |
October 28th, 2004, 09:11 PM | #336 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 10
|
Thanks Dan
I was considering having this unit but your confession told me not to....
Thanks!
__________________
PJ |
October 28th, 2004, 10:18 PM | #337 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
The Panasonic decks look great on paper compared to the Sony DSR11.
lower price adds 7.5IRE setup headphone jack audio meters (nice to have for dubbing tapes) reads and records DVCPRO, reads DVCAM (doesn't write DVCAM unfortunately) I can't say I have experience with this deck but it seems like a better choice than the DSR11. I have used a JVC SVHS/mini-DV (the cheapest real deck on the market) but I would avoid them. If you don't really need a full blown deck, I'd probably try to pick up a used/cheap camcorder. Ebay and camera stores would be places to try if you are comfortable with that (be careful on eBay). If you manage to wear out the heads on a cheap camcorder then you know you may need a deck. |
October 29th, 2004, 06:07 AM | #338 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
i use an old camcorder but ideally i woudl like a deck with a screen to use to show edits to clients without having the need to author a dvd.
Unfortunetaly budget is whats holding me back and i really dont need it when the MX500 im using has a 3 and half inch screen, while teh GDV1000 has a 4' screen, which really isnt all that much of a difference.. and ive got a camera to boot... ;) |
October 31st, 2004, 09:30 AM | #339 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 25
|
Using trv30 for deck?
Workflow question--can I use my sony TRV30 as a deck--so I don't have to use the FX1 for this purpose? I'd use the TRV30 to capture, rewind, fast forward and print to tape--
|
October 31st, 2004, 10:46 AM | #340 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Is the TRV30 mpeg2-ts (HDV) compatible? Rewinding and fastforwarding is fine, but you won't be able to play or record HDV footage on a non-HDV device.
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
October 31st, 2004, 01:06 PM | #341 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 25
|
I'm not sure I understand--I would want to shoot with the FX1--then take the miniDV tape out of the camera and put it into my regular miniDV (standard def), and then firewire xfer into my pc. After editing in an HDV compatible NLE, output then to another miniDV tape to my standard def miniDV camera. Then, take the miniDV tape out of the my camera and put into the FX1 for playback on a hi-def monitor/tv.
Basically--is there any way around using the FX1 camera as a deck--so I don't have to use the heads too much? <<<-- Originally posted by Heath McKnight : Is the TRV30 mpeg2-ts (HDV) compatible? Rewinding and fastforwarding is fine, but you won't be able to play or record HDV footage on a non-HDV device. heath -->>> |
October 31st, 2004, 03:21 PM | #342 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
You can't do that with a mini-dv camera. It will play green or red video with no audio, because it can't decode the HDV signal. On the JVC HD10, you can flip the iLink (FireWire) output between DV and mpeg2-TS (HDV).
Therefore, you need to use the FX1 to transfer HDV from tape to PC. You'll also need special software to capture the HDV software, such as Aspect HD. So, you need special HDV software and your HDV camera to get your HDV footage into your computer. Hope this helps, heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
October 31st, 2004, 06:54 PM | #343 |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Right -- just because the tape is the same, doesn't mean that the data's the same.
If you want to shoot standard-def miniDV on your FX1, then you could do what you describe. But if you want to shoot in HDV mode, you must have an HDV device (deck or camera) to play the footage back. A miniDV camera will choke on an HDV tape, unable to play anything back. |
October 31st, 2004, 07:01 PM | #344 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 25
|
I thought that might be the case--just wanted to verify it. You'd think a "consumer" level deck would sell well--but I haven't come across any, even for SD miniDV (at least inexpensive ones). Perhaps I'm over-reacting to those who say that using your camera as a deck can cut the camera's life in half--
Thanks for the quick responses-- |
October 31st, 2004, 07:40 PM | #345 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
If you shoot in HDV or SD, you will NOT be able to play it, only DV.
heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
| ||||||
|
|