July 7th, 2003, 10:51 AM | #166 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 10
|
Recommended DV DECK for XL1s ????
And you are using the Canon XL1s?
No glitches or jumps?
__________________
Help each other for a common good |
July 7th, 2003, 01:17 PM | #168 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,558
|
I use both the Panasonic DV2000 and the DV1000. NEVER had a problem, and I shoot both the XL-1 and the XL-1s. Bob Safay
|
July 7th, 2003, 03:44 PM | #169 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 10
|
what's the difference between the 1000 and 2000?
is it noticable? I am editing using Premiere 6.5. does it matter how many lines the VTR has? I see that the 2000 has over 500 horizontal lines. will this give a higher quality image than the DV 1000? Will I get a better image by using my XL1s to export footage to my PC?
__________________
Help each other for a common good |
July 7th, 2003, 06:07 PM | #170 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,489
|
I shoot XL1 and Gl1. No probelms with playback of tapes in tapes in Sony DHR-1000 or GV-D300.
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com |
July 8th, 2003, 09:10 AM | #171 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Tickfaw, LA
Posts: 1,217
|
If you are recording in LP mode that may give you a few more problems. SP mode should work better (no change in resolution between SP & LP). Some people will use almost any dv device to use as a substitute deck.
__________________
Nathan Gifford Southern Cyclist Magazine & Productions For quick answers try our Search! To see me and Rob Lohman click here |
July 8th, 2003, 03:40 PM | #172 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,558
|
There is a BIG difference. The DV1000 is a basic DV deck. Play, record, pause, a few audio ajustments. The DV2000 is an editing deck with frame accurate dials, and the capability to store edit in and out points of multipal scenes, edit scenes, and, it can control either a DV1000 or an LX-1 or 1s via firewire. It also allows you to record video over audio, insert new audio over video, or mix audio. It is much bigger and has a removeable control panal. The end product is truely beautiful. I use it to do my master tapes. Bob Safay
|
July 15th, 2003, 04:17 PM | #173 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: san diego
Posts: 22
|
which deck would you reccomend
the Sony DSR-1800, the DSR11 or the DSR25...
|
July 16th, 2003, 10:47 PM | #174 |
_redone_
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 224
|
DVX100 footage from DV deck
is it possible to play back or capture 24p footage from a DV deck that has been filmed with the DVX100? i understand the camera peforms a 3:2 pulldown but does this process take place from the actually filming to tape or from camera to NLE?
Thanks
__________________
Adam Lawrence eatdrink Media Las Vegas NV www.eatdrinkmedia.com |
July 16th, 2003, 10:53 PM | #175 |
Space Hipster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,508
|
Yes. Check the resources at the top of this forum for detailed info as this topic is covered in great detail there and in a number of threads.
|
July 18th, 2003, 04:55 PM | #176 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 51
|
I don't know much about the 25 or the 1800 but I've had the DSR11 for 6 months now & it's great. Worth every penny.
|
July 18th, 2003, 05:41 PM | #177 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I may need a deck that has component video output. Any suggestions? DSR-45?
|
July 21st, 2003, 11:14 AM | #178 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 355
|
my DSR-45 has been typical Sony, great so far, 4 months old.
S-video, DV, and component. this has saved me many headaches being able to switch between the source types. no black burst box yet and my Beta 1800 wont talk to the DSR-45, so, straight to S-Video. Plus there is real cool factor to that tiny monitor. its pretty useless for any thing other than video verification, though. |
July 21st, 2003, 05:36 PM | #179 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Gary Chavez : Plus there is real cool factor to that tiny monitor. its pretty useless for any thing other than video verification, though. -->>>
Actually my application would not be editing, but playback of video cues being sent to a projector as part of a multi-media production. I need component video to get the best results with a large DLP projector that takes component as the native input format. The little screen would be useful to preview and advance to the next cue. Not sure if this is the best route for us, there are also software applications specifically for this but they're probably overkill for our needs... |
July 22nd, 2003, 08:19 AM | #180 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2002
Location: boise, idaho
Posts: 8
|
Component output from DV is a waste of time. DV totally sucks compared to any other component recording format.
If image quality is important, put DV at the bottom of your list of possible choices. Convenience and ubiquity are the only things DV has going for it. bogiesan
__________________
David Bogie ristretto doppio My other two cars are a Tour Easy and a Cannondale. |
| ||||||
|
|