|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 27th, 2009, 10:35 AM | #31 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Although it's called a 16x9 hood Roger, I actually think it's 4:3 in aspect ratio. Can you confirm or deny this please?
|
August 28th, 2009, 01:23 AM | #32 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 7
|
|
August 28th, 2009, 03:43 AM | #33 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 7
|
New picture with and without 16/9 Inc 0.7x wide angle :
Zoom "télé", without 16/9 Inc http://www.darktab.net/~rbaudet/public/HM100-4.jpg Zoom "télé", with 16/9 Inc http://www.darktab.net/~rbaudet/public/HM100-5.jpg[ Zoom "Wide", without 16/9 Inc http://www.darktab.net/~rbaudet/public/HM100-6.jpg Zoom "wide", with 16/9 Inc http://www.darktab.net/~rbaudet/public/HM100-7.jpg[ |
August 28th, 2009, 06:10 AM | #34 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
|
September 10th, 2009, 11:10 AM | #35 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 432
|
just had an online chat with one of the JVC sales rep he told me that the expected date from JVC wide angle lens came and passed, and they didn't receive anything yet. I placed an order on 7/27. Just wanted to give anyone intrested the heads up.
|
September 10th, 2009, 09:34 PM | #36 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas/Hong Kong
Posts: 154
|
I was able to buy the JVC wide angle lens along with the HM 100 in Hong Kong a week ago, I guess HK hasn't run out yet.
|
September 24th, 2009, 10:07 PM | #37 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 30
|
The JVC wide angle lens just got back in stock at B&H. Anyone know of any filters or any type of protection for this lens?
|
September 25th, 2009, 01:25 AM | #38 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 457
|
You are joking about filters? As it was said (even in this thread) there is nothing to attach filters to on a converter! No sun hood either. This converter is just the same as from GZ7 consumer model from a couple of years ago.
|
September 25th, 2009, 01:35 AM | #39 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Quote:
Best way to use it? Unfiltered, fitted straight onto the camera's zoom, using an aspect ratio shadowed lens hood. tom. |
|
October 14th, 2009, 11:05 AM | #40 |
Tourist
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1
|
Nikon WC-E68 .7x Lens Convertor - Barrel Distortion?
I'm about to buy the Nikon Lens Convertor and I wanted to know if there is any barrel distortion from it. I'll be using the lens for real estate shoots and am trying to avoid " bent " walls.
|
October 14th, 2009, 11:53 AM | #41 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
You don't say what camera you're going to use the Nikon lens on, or whether it's a zoom through or not. I'll take an educated guess and say yes, you'll have barrel distortion all right, simply because most camcorder zooms barrel distort right out of the box.
|
October 15th, 2009, 08:11 AM | #42 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas/Hong Kong
Posts: 154
|
Even with the JVC WA lens, there is definitely distortion, hello bent walls!
|
October 15th, 2009, 08:55 AM | #43 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxford UK
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
In case you're wondering, the lens hood is one I made using the hood from a Canon XH series camera, mated to a Cavision hood mount, adapted. Works great with the wide angle adapter, but hey, had to make it myself - what does that say about JVC? |
|
October 15th, 2009, 09:07 AM | #44 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxford UK
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Roger, how's that 16x9 WA adapter in terms of interior dust? If you hold up to a bright light source and look through either end, any specs inside? Much? None? Appreciate it, Cotty. |
|
October 15th, 2009, 09:35 AM | #45 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Paget, Bermuda
Posts: 52
|
I'm not Roger, but I can answer that question: speckless.
|
| ||||||
|
|