|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 19th, 2007, 10:21 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 87
|
What to do now that I got the darn thing? :)
My HD110U is on its way, to hopefully arrive on Thursday. :)
I've heard a lot of talk about how this beautiful camera doesn't actually work perfectly out of the box. What all do I have to do to get it up and running in tip top shape? Calibrations, scene files, other settings, changing bad defaults... Thanks guys... Last edited by Brian Orser; March 20th, 2007 at 06:53 PM. Reason: clarification |
March 19th, 2007, 10:31 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 471
|
Huh?
It works really good out of the box. My only advice is to turn down the detail setting to "minimum". This produces a smother picture especially in HD modes. I've tried the TrueColor3 settings but the footage looked like a TV with the color turned all the way up. Too much saturation and ugly skin tones. I prefer the stock color settings. I would try to not use the "Full Auto" mode too often, since it forces you to use Auto White Balance & Auto Gain up to 18db, which might not look so great. |
March 19th, 2007, 10:41 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 247
|
Scott is right about True Colors 3, i find myself having to color correct in post, and turning down saturation 40%
I like my camera, there are times I wish I had an auto focus. I film weddings with my camera, and I have issue with the camera and low light, she does not like low light, but then again, I have done things wrong in the past. |
March 20th, 2007, 05:02 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Croydon, England
Posts: 277
|
I like the bleach bypass scene file, produces lovely muted tones (probably not ideal for weddings!)
|
March 20th, 2007, 06:50 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 87
|
Maybe I heard wrong (and I know I should just experiment and I will of course do so extensively, but I'm gonna be something almost immediately), but I've picked up that things like detail, color, gamma, etc are not the best out of the box.
Obviously I will be setting things like WB and gain for each shot -- I was just looking for any general tips to get better overall picture quality. Thanks guys. I'll look into your suggestions. |
March 20th, 2007, 07:00 PM | #6 | |
JVC America
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
__________________
Carl Hicks JVC Professional Products Company Last edited by Carl Hicks; March 20th, 2007 at 07:53 PM. |
|
March 20th, 2007, 07:07 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 87
|
Excellent. Thank you Carl.
Perhaps these stories of out-of-the-box dissatisfaction were due to dissatisfaction with a neutral image (ie, "something was missing"). I intend to play around as much as I can. :) Thanks again |
March 23rd, 2007, 03:56 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
As far as low light, I use 9db gain while shooting indoors with dark lighting. I use an IDX LED onboard light, which has a 1/2 CTO orange gel. I use manual white balance religiously. Stay away from Auto White balance when shooting with low light levels. |
|
March 23rd, 2007, 06:23 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 512
|
|
March 24th, 2007, 10:11 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 87
|
Stephan, if truecolor was made to give good lattitude, how is it not a "usable" scene file?
|
March 25th, 2007, 05:48 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 512
|
As in, it's not intended to be used "out of the box." I see a lot of people talking about how "great" TC looks, when its actual look wasn't what Paolo was going for. He was just going for lattitude in post, not any particular "look," it's intended that you take your TC footage and color correct it to how you want it to look, not use it as-is.
|
March 25th, 2007, 02:20 PM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 87
|
Of course. That's a given. Thank you for clarifying.
|
March 25th, 2007, 07:39 PM | #13 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
:-) |
|
March 25th, 2007, 09:54 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Larkspur, CA
Posts: 378
|
Well It's been said a gazillion times but I will dust it off again...
Once you go with a fully manual lens- especially for run and gun- you'll never go back. There I said it again. Now that we hijcaked Brian's thread... Brian- how are you making out with your new camera? |
March 25th, 2007, 10:28 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 87
|
Justin,
I don't mind sparking a little unrelated discussion any day. :) I'm getting along quite well with it. It's bizarre how similar it is to shoting with an SLR (like my Cannon A2). However, and this hurts, I haven't recorded a thing, because I haven't chosen a tape stock yet and dont want to switch around. But, I'm loving it so far, even on that tiny screen and VF. Brian |
| ||||||
|
|