|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 3rd, 2007, 06:49 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
The Best Possible Settings
I've looked at some of the other settings posted around but haven't found any I like as much as my own. I produced them through using the camera and reacting to what I see. I would like to know if people agree with me. To me, this produces the most realistic pleasing picture:
Master Black: Normal Detail: Depends on HD or SD. Black: Normal White Clip: 100% for simple video work, 108% if doing more post work on footage Knee: Manual 85% ADV PROCESS: Cinelike: Off COLOUR MATRIX: Standard: R Gain -2 R Rot 1 G Gain -2 G Rot Norm B Gain Norm B Rot Min Gamma: Cinelike Level: Normal Colour Gain: 3 White Paints R&B: Normal |
March 3rd, 2007, 07:36 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 590
|
Hey, I will try out your settings this week and see how they compare to Paolo's.
|
March 3rd, 2007, 08:07 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
Thanks Steve,
I'd be interested to see if you agree. I did a direct comparison to Paolo's and I preferred mine. |
March 3rd, 2007, 10:06 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 636
|
This is a very touchy subject because there's no definitive right or wrong. Image preference is highly subjective and depends on each person. What one person likes, another won't. So honestly there is no "perfect" setting for a camera. It depends on the look you want and the content.
What are you shooting with these settings? Ben |
March 3rd, 2007, 11:19 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 590
|
That's very true. But if you want the most "Accurate" picture, then certain settings are better than others.
|
March 3rd, 2007, 11:43 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
All sorts, daylight, tungsten, mixed. I have tweaked whenever I see an issue under any conditions. This is what I have come up with.
My work is mainly corporate, so is a lot of run and gun and very varied. This is my best "General Use" setting. In response to the subjectivity, that's exactly why I posted it. Some people may like to try it on their camera. If they don't like the look, I don't mind. I'd just be interested to see what people say. Mike Last edited by Mike Marriage; March 3rd, 2007 at 06:16 PM. |
March 3rd, 2007, 03:59 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 636
|
I agree Mike. If I had my camera with my right now I'd run the settings right into it. But alas, I don't so I'll have to test it latter.
I'm not saying the set up won't work great at all, they look really good. But even you have said that it's the best general setting and that you tweak it. I'm anxious to try it and see what it produces. In my opinion if a particular setting works for at least 85% of the work you do, then that's the setting to go with. There's always times you have to tweak but that's expected. I'll give the settings a go when I can. Thanks. Ben |
March 3rd, 2007, 06:17 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
|
March 11th, 2007, 06:13 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 221
|
anyone tried it?
|
March 12th, 2007, 03:41 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 370
|
Mike
Can you upload some stills using these settings? Andrew |
March 13th, 2007, 02:39 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
|
|
March 13th, 2007, 04:23 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 221
|
I have on the HD200 - not much difference bettween the two i must say
|
| ||||||
|
|