|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 22nd, 2007, 06:19 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virgina, USA
Posts: 276
|
Shopping Cart Feedback! JVC-GYHD200 ++
Ok - this may be a bit unconventional, but I'd like to post my shopping cart to solicit feedback from the HDV crew - particularly those who own/use the HD200u.
Here's an image of the cart. I'm looking for improvements, deletions, additions...etc. The DR-HD100 does NOT record 720/60p (bummer), but I suspect it will be valuable nonetheless. That does bring up a question: What's the difference at 100% speed between 30p and 60p? I would expect there to be one with slo-mo, but not at much 100...? Anyway - spend my money wisely! *grin.... |
February 23rd, 2007, 08:43 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
I'd suggest better quality filters. B+W, or (on a budget) Hoya Super Multi Coated.
|
February 23rd, 2007, 09:42 AM | #3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virgina, USA
Posts: 276
|
Frosted the Filterman vs. Frosty the Filter
Quote:
So specifically: a Polarizer (linear?) and protection; something to keep the dust out; something for camels to spit on...but really - what else for a general kit? I honestly don't think I want some of these diffusers, and I hardly have a head knowledge large enough to carry around 5 different grades of ND filters - most of what I shoot is event-style - happens quick. You miss it, it's gone. So unless I can know that on camera filtering is superior, I'm more inclined to post it. Perhaps it's experience, but I'm almost always shooting w/o a grip or PA, too. SO another way to ask that: Which is better - getting the right filter on the glass - or getting the right filter on the footage (after the fact)? With the power of certain filters, Look Suite MB in particular, is it better to shoot interviews/portrait stuff clean so you can do whatever later - or is the official answer - you need to know what you're doing and which filter to apply, and apply it - correctly, each time, while you're shooting? :=) Jeff |
|
February 23rd, 2007, 10:10 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
People can get rowdy sometimes. I once had somebody throw food at the camera while I was shooting (he thought he was being funny I guess, but the humor was lost on me), so for events, especially where alcohol is being served, I'd suggest having a UV filter in front of the lens for protection.
A polarizer and ND filters can be very useful for outdoor shooting. Use a circular polarizer with digital cameras. For the most part, I don't see much use for special filters, like diffusers or color filters. You can pretty much achieve those effects in post. |
February 23rd, 2007, 10:21 AM | #5 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virgina, USA
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks - Jeff |
||
February 23rd, 2007, 10:54 AM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 969
|
Quote:
If so, 60p = 60 frames per second. 30p = 30 frames per second. So the difference is 30p. What do I win? Seriously, do a search, there's lots of good info on 60p on this site. |
|
February 23rd, 2007, 11:17 AM | #7 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virgina, USA
Posts: 276
|
When 60 - 30 doesn't = 30
Quote:
LOL. I mean visually - not literally. There are more frames per second - but I'm wondering what the distilled, practical results are. By the time this get hammered into a 4:3 DVD for use at home (wide aspect) - what's the difference? Quote:
I think I'm asking only to determine whether to, as standard op, shoot 720/30p or 60p - why wouldn't I always shoot 60p? I mean, there's going to be a conversion somewhere at some point - should I favor 30p in the camera so I don't have to render it down later? Should I just shoot at 60p b/c it's "better" and deal with conversion at a later time...but that's more what I meant. Lemme search a bit more here. It's incredible the amount of information here. I'm sorry for not looking before asking - there's just a lot of little questions stitched up in actually plunking down 15k =) |
||
February 23rd, 2007, 11:23 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
Visually, 60p gives you much smoother motion than 30p (not a film-like judder).
|
February 23rd, 2007, 11:24 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burbank
Posts: 1,811
|
I believe HD200 comes with an Anton Bauer battery plate built in.
The plate have have selected is for the HD100/110. |
February 23rd, 2007, 11:33 AM | #10 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virgina, USA
Posts: 276
|
The $ound of $aving
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
February 23rd, 2007, 11:39 AM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virgina, USA
Posts: 276
|
Disk Recorder
Quote:
Because 60p has, well, twice as many frames per second. Who wouldn't want that? Thanks - Jeff |
|
February 23rd, 2007, 12:01 PM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
I don't know why the DR-HD100 wouldn't be able to record at 60p. As far as I know, it's simply recording the MPEG2 data stream coming from the firewire port.
|
February 23rd, 2007, 03:21 PM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
Also remember that the DR-HD100 has no 24/25P QT support for the HD200 yet. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
BTW, the HD200 already comes with the Gold Mount adapter built in, and like all Anton Bauer Gold mounts, it comes with the powertap receptacle. I made the mistake of buying the AB Adapter for the HD100U thinking I would need it on the HD200 , but once I realized my mistake I decided to swap it for a Porta Brace carry bag (which is perfect for this camera) and paid the difference. .
__________________
I will be KING! |
February 23rd, 2007, 03:30 PM | #14 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virgina, USA
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
February 23rd, 2007, 04:29 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Larkspur, CA
Posts: 378
|
When they say that it doesn't support 720p60 does that mean that it just doesn't put the quicktime wrapper on it?
I was under the impression that it would still record an M2T file at 720p60. |
| ||||||
|
|