|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 9th, 2007, 05:38 PM | #16 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
In setting my BF, when I have the chart 3 meters away and go wde, it seems like I am only able estimate its focus, as any little movement on BF ring takes the chart way in/and out of focus. Are there any ways that you recommend to dial in the wide end, should I move my chart closer in? |
|
February 9th, 2007, 06:03 PM | #17 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belfast, UK
Posts: 6,152
|
Quote:
|
|
February 9th, 2007, 06:25 PM | #18 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
|
|
February 9th, 2007, 06:58 PM | #19 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
I don't see how it possible to adjust back focus without an HD monitor. |
|
February 9th, 2007, 10:12 PM | #20 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1,158
|
use focus assist and the LCD. its far from ideal but it works once you get the hang of it. usually I bring a 13" sony broadcast CRT as backup. I do plan to change to a LCD soon once I find something for a few hundred that has what I need.
Steve O |
February 21st, 2007, 11:40 AM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 755
|
I think my focus is swaying a little everytime I take the camera out.
I'm currently recording 25p SD at the moment (HDV is next), the focus assist is lit up like a christmas tree but when I view the footage back home there's a definite softness/blurryness to it. Should you expect progressive footage to be less sharp than interlaced (25p vs 50i for example?) I've used the chart, but was advised around 30 foot away - I'm going to do this again tomorrow but at around 2-3 metres. I have to rely on the camera's LCD and viewfinder and don't have the luxury of a quality monitor (either field of HD monitor at home). It's often difficult to even see what's coming off the camera in bright sunlight. It's somewhat frustrating viewing such footage on a camera capable of so much...yes, I'd like to borrow guys like Tim Dashwoods head for just one day! I'll attempt the chart again in the meantime and see if the footage improves. Cheers. |
February 21st, 2007, 02:55 PM | #22 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
I just read this whole thread and didn't notice a mention to open the aperture all the way when backfocusing.
On the stock lens open all the way up to F1.4 to get the shortest DOF possible. If you are outside turn on the ND filters and increase the shutter speed if necessary. I've seen people try to backfocus at F4 and F5.6 and it is totally useless at those smaller aperture settings. The procedure is:
This should be performed before every shoot or change in environment. Temperature changes will cause the mount to expand or contract and throw off the back focus. Backfocus is a huge issue with all HD production because of the relatively short focal plane of the CCDs combined with very high resolution. Bad focus is instantly noticable on the big screen, and proper back focus should be a priority. The backfocus problem was so bad with the Sony F900 being used in film productions, that Clairmont created their own lens mount out of "space age" materials. More info here.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
February 22nd, 2007, 04:53 AM | #23 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 969
|
Quote:
They should print your post in the manual, just below where it says, "It is only necessary to perform this when the lens is attached for the first time". Muppets. |
|
February 22nd, 2007, 05:08 AM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 755
|
Yes, great advice. It can get a bit lonely out there where you're convinced it's either your equipment (new at that) failing or you're going mad. Good to know these gremlins appear for other people too.
I might try and laminate a star chard and keep this in the bag for all shoots now...don't suppose the laminate 'gloss' would effect the focus? Is it possible to pick up a plastic backed star chart (as per warm/grey cards etc)? |
February 22nd, 2007, 11:03 AM | #25 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belfast, UK
Posts: 6,152
|
Quote:
http://www.panavision.co.uk/ Although, it would be cheaper to print out one and get it laminated. However, one of the Panavision charts does have an Annular Focus Target as well as the star. This uses the V/F peaking to help set the backfocus - it works extremely well on the high end HD cameras, however, I couldn't say how well it would work with the JVC's focus assist. It could be worthwhile putting this thread up as a sticky, because I gave the method of setting the backfocus on a previous thread and I expect it will be a re-occurring question. |
|
February 22nd, 2007, 11:27 AM | #26 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 755
|
Thanks Brian - I'll take a look and yes there are a few recent threads with priceless advice which could do with being stickies perhaps?
|
| ||||||
|
|