|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 18th, 2006, 05:32 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
In the absence of 60p, How2getSloMo?
The HD110 doesn't shoot 60p. So my question is: What would be a good and effective way to get professional looking Slow Motion when your only options are 24p and 30p. What's the best software to achieve it?
__________________
I will be KING! |
December 18th, 2006, 06:20 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 343
|
Progressive scan at 24, 25 or 30 fps will not produce good results with interpolated slo-mo. No software can really do anything about this. The best solution with your camera is to shoot in the esoteric SD 50 or 60p MPEG2 format. 50p is based on PAL resolution so it will up-scale better to 720p than the NTSC-based 60p SD version.
If you search this forum, there are various discussions on how best to do this with the different NLEs out there. |
December 18th, 2006, 08:23 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
shoot 60i and run at 50%, in some editors, it will de-interlace and use every other field when expanding...in others, you can get plugins or scripts that will de/re interlace for you...
This has been covered here: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=68425 |
December 18th, 2006, 08:24 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Larkspur, CA
Posts: 378
|
The best slow motion/time effects software is twixtor...
http://www.revisionfx.com/rstwixtor.htm You can demo the plug in and see of it works for you. Best. |
December 18th, 2006, 10:58 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 512
|
You can only shoot 60i in standard def with this camera, and as another poster mentioned the camera allows you to shoot 60p in standard def. Why would you want to shoot 60i when you can shoot 60p at the same resolution (really double the vertical resolution)?
|
December 18th, 2006, 11:35 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 117
|
Twixtor works great! Just a note on the sample video on their site: This is a New Zealand band and I saw their video on TV her about 6-12months ago. On the big screen the footage looks amazing, I thought they would have used a Varicam etc. The TV feed was only SD but it looked great just like film cranking.
__________________
Ainslie Davies - www.dualityproductions.com |
December 19th, 2006, 12:28 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
I think shake will do stuff like that too...time ramping and what not with interpolated frames to fill space.
http://www.apple.com/shake |
December 19th, 2006, 12:43 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 232
|
I found the built in speed controls in PPRo2 using Aspect HD work pretty good down to about 70%, without frame blending. 80% speed has a great feel to it.
Jon |
December 19th, 2006, 03:28 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
Thank you guys for providing so much information. You guys are priceless. I'll be trying most of these suggested solutions and see what I like best.
__________________
I will be KING! |
December 19th, 2006, 03:47 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 370
|
I've found the Timewarp filter in After Effects Pro to be very good at slo-mo, although like all these slo-mo rendering can be very slow.
In fact I've managed to create pretty good ramping with timewarp. Andrew |
December 19th, 2006, 03:59 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
Someone posted some slomo they did with the hd110 and though the colors and resolution looked amazing, I did notice that the motion was still not slow enough. In fact, all the examples I've seen give me that impression. I guess that in order to achieve slower motion the camera would have to be able to shoot 120fps and that's just not happening.
__________________
I will be KING! |
December 19th, 2006, 04:58 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 343
|
Software interpolated slo mo often looks fine from 50i or 60i but - with 24, 25 or 30 fps progressive, there just isn't the temporal information to interpolate from. Results from 24p in particular are very disappointing compared to what you'd get from, say, regular interlaced DV. If you own a HD100, there is absolutely no point shooting 60i or 50i when you can shoot SD res 60p or 50p, which will certainly give you better results. As I've said, 50p is based on PAL resolution so it'll look better when bumped up to 720p.
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:34 PM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 471
|
I use the "Frame Blending" feature when changing the speed in FCP. It basically creates a cross fade between each frame which gives it a very smooth motion. It doesn't look bad at all. I use it all the time for my wedding videos.
|
December 19th, 2006, 06:02 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellsboro, Pa
Posts: 285
|
Here is a short sample of a music video I just shot on the HD100 this way.
Everything you see here except for the intro macro shots of the guitar was shot in 60i and changed to 50% duration....no other interpolating was done. The majority of the video is in 24p, not this type of slomo...what you are going to see is not the final product, but rather just some clips I put into the timeline over the song to see how this looked. http://www.the24thframe.com/video/answers.wmv |
December 19th, 2006, 06:44 PM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
Quote:
__________________
I will be KING! |
|
| ||||||
|
|