|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 21st, 2006, 11:47 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
The Stutteriness, the motion trail, the ghosting, oh the humanity!
My biggest problem with the HD100U(a) has been the exaggerated stutter and motion trail/ghosting that happens in 24p. I've tried what Paolo advised me by turning off the MOtion Smoothing, and lot's of other recipes, but I still get the damned stuttery images. In fact, I get that both at 24p and 30p. I just saw a movie teaser shot with an HD100u and again I saw stutter/motion trailing/ghosting. I swear to god, if I find no solution to this I'm gonna go crazy and throw this thing out the window. Somebody help me please. Thank you.
__________________
I will be KING! |
August 21st, 2006, 11:54 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Rainier, MD
Posts: 428
|
Shooting 24P or 30P is not the same as shooting 60i. You have to adapt your shooting methods. Always follow the action. Pans and zooms have to be either really fast or really slow. That's just the way it is on any camera when shooting 24P or 30P.
|
August 22nd, 2006, 12:00 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 512
|
What shutter speed are you using? 1/48 should pretty much give you the same motion look as film. If you're unhappy with the look of 1/48, I would suggest watching a movie some time and seeing how it compares.
It also depends on where you're watching to footage too... Computers, especially PCs, can sometimes drop frames especially from high bitrate and/or processor intensive material. Such as, say, HD-resolution video at 25 Mbits/sec. That's a whole lotta pixels to draw every 24th of a second. Like Brett said as well, 24p isn't like regular video. You can get away with motion at 60Hz that will completely fall apart at 24Hz. |
August 22nd, 2006, 12:05 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
Quote:
__________________
I will be KING! |
|
August 22nd, 2006, 12:11 AM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york city
Posts: 346
|
Quote:
__________________
I will be KING! |
|
August 22nd, 2006, 02:13 AM | #6 | |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=68745 |
|
August 22nd, 2006, 04:39 AM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 471
|
Quote:
HDV24/30p or DV60i will appear in the top left hand corner on your viewfinder. Also, the camera has a blue/orange LED on the side of the camera that lets you know if you are shooting HDV or SD. Blue=HDV Orange=Standard Def. |
|
August 22nd, 2006, 01:51 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 245
|
Not wishing to make excuses for the camera but there is a degree of perception in all of this. You have picked up on something that you are now tuning into everytime you watch footage. However, it would probably be fairly true to say an objective viewer may be far less sensitive to this. I know this does not solve the problem but be sure that your viewer will be far more miffed if your content is duff even if you shoot 35mm. Try and de-tune a bit if you catch my drift.
Regards Greg |
August 22nd, 2006, 03:29 PM | #9 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Jaadgy,
I'd like to know what kind of display device you are viewing on. Plasma, LCD or CRT HDTV?
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
August 22nd, 2006, 03:39 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 589
|
Also, would you consider uploading a short example clip if I set you up with space? It might speed things up a bit with another pair (or twenty) of eyes. ;)
__________________
Our eyes allow us to see the world - The lens allows others to see the world through our eyes. RED ONE #977 |
August 22nd, 2006, 06:48 PM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 512
|
Quote:
As for what to avoid, just try to avoid a great deal of motion unless you're trying to achieve that look. There are guidelines available for maximum panning speeds and so forth at certain telephoto lengths. |
|
August 23rd, 2006, 01:17 AM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ - USA
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
Usually a film camera is panning or tilting slowly while tracking an object - like your actor. The background is off in the distance, so it's moving a small amount relatively. The actor isn't actually moving much at all because he's being tracked by the pan or tilt. The more zoomed in you are the worse the effect will be. Find a shot from a movie and duplicate it with your camera. You should get similar results. You'll probably notice that panning and tilt speeds are generally pretty slow. |
|
August 23rd, 2006, 07:29 AM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sauk Rapids, MN, USA
Posts: 1,675
|
|
August 24th, 2006, 11:45 AM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,065
|
Clearly, the camera produces stobbing in a similar fashion as a film camera. But does the compression of the camera (6 frame GOP) increase this effect, or merely add the potentiality of digital artifacts?
Are they seperate phemnomia, or interelated? From my use, I tend to think they are seperate 'problems' and that the stobbing of the JVC is more or less the same as a film camera... john evilgeniusentertainment.com |
August 24th, 2006, 01:03 PM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ - USA
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|