|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 23rd, 2006, 03:18 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 31
|
Capture card
Would it be worth it to capture everything with a card like the AJA Kona for the HD100U footage as opposed to just going straight in through firewire to FCP?
|
May 23rd, 2006, 04:24 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 123
|
That really depends on what you want to do with your footage. Do you want to edit native HDV 30fps (or hopefully soon 24), or use your deck as an analogue source and change to uncompresssed HD or DVCProHD on capture? There are a lot of considerations either way.
__________________
Andy Young Director/DP www.ArchipelagoFilms.com VP, Special Projects www.DuArt.com |
May 23rd, 2006, 10:02 AM | #3 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,116
|
Quote:
|
|
May 23rd, 2006, 10:04 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Steilacoom Washington
Posts: 72
|
I capture my HDV footage through FW, and edit it native, but still have the Kona card to provide output to an HD monitor; the Kona 2 which I have, also provides some extra processing horsepower for HDV and DVCProHD (I use both codecs), as well as HD-SDI in/and out for other formats.
Gary Morris McBeath SaltAire Cinema Productions |
May 26th, 2006, 12:18 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 31
|
I'm thinking about getting this:
http://www.aja.com/html/products_con...s_HD10AVA.html It seems like the Kona card but in a smaller package. Has anyone had any experience with these smaller boxes? From what I understand I would need a video card that takes a composite signal and then the box would go to the card right? What are some good options for the video card? I'm editing a short film that will ultimately end up on dvd and festivals. Thanks for your advice. Cal |
May 26th, 2006, 09:37 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
I've used both native HDV and the analog component HD from the JVC's. I would say the native is better both visually and technically, coming off tape that is. True, the analog outs are uncompressed 60p during shooting, but once it's on tape, you are going through JVC's analog encoders. This introduces some noise and color space conversion. Staying native is going to move exactly what is on the tape to the NLE 1:1. Problem is, if you shoot in 24p, today, you can't use FCPro without 2-3 step conversions of each file. Using a Kona analog HD input, you can capture 24p. Even with 30p we are having some problems with stream errors over firewire, where shots are getting broken up into smaller clips during HDV capture. Using Kona eliminates this problem. On the other hand, 100Mbit file sizes of DVCProHD analog transcoded HDV, vs 19Mbit files of native JVC HDV makes a damn good argument to capture native if the broken clip prob and 24p issue can be resolved. Dave Beaty |
|
May 27th, 2006, 07:45 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 123
|
RS-422 and Kona
Hi Dave,
I'd love to know how your RS-422 connection works when you capture via the Kona card. Are you getting good machine control? Are you getting timecode via RS-422, and if so, what timebase is it? Have you ever tried of considered capturing an analogue DV downconvert and then using timecode to recapture uncompressed later on? Do you think it would work? Thanks for your thoughts.
__________________
Andy Young Director/DP www.ArchipelagoFilms.com VP, Special Projects www.DuArt.com |
May 28th, 2006, 12:55 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 31
|
Thanks for the input. I appreciate it!
|
| ||||||
|
|