|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 26th, 2006, 05:49 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 173
|
Another real Job done with the HD100
The HD100 is really coming into its own I don't think I really need to say that here. This is also for all those people out there who are wondering what work is really being done with HD100. The article is not real in-depth but the outcome is very positive for the to the HD100
Another "real World " Job with the HD100 Last edited by Matthew Pugerude; March 26th, 2006 at 06:46 PM. |
March 26th, 2006, 06:02 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
The link doesn't seem to work...could you, please, check it again?
Okay...works now, thanks!
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
March 26th, 2006, 06:02 PM | #3 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 173
|
Fixed
Quote:
I fixed the link first time making a link in the forum sorry |
|
March 29th, 2006, 08:28 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tokyo/Sydney
Posts: 297
|
I hope thats SD60p and not DV that he's using.
__________________
"eyes through a digital world" |
March 29th, 2006, 05:57 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 418
|
native 16:9?
is said in that article that the hd100's have "three widescreen-native 1280 x 720 pixel CCDs".
I've been looking at upgrading from my pd150 to a hd100 or 101.. i've viewed the 101 and it did not have native 16:9 ccds.. well at least thats what i was told, is there a difference between the 100 and the 101 when it comes to native 16:9 ccds? going to have to read some more reviews on it before i make any decisions.. i guess the z1 is the only other option. i do like the 24p mode on the 101 though.. . wow went off topic, sorry,. |
March 29th, 2006, 11:12 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
The 100 PAL version doesn't have Firewire input, the 101 does. That is the only difference between the cameras. They are both native 16:9 SD or HDV. Dan Weber |
|
March 29th, 2006, 11:18 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 418
|
.
cheers dan, i've got a hd100 brochure infront of me and it says nothing about the ccds being 16:9 native.. then again it says nothing about them being native 4:3 either.
|
March 29th, 2006, 11:43 PM | #8 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
The CCDs on the HD100 are indeed 16:9, 1280x720 square pixel. JVC has been putting this info out for over a year now.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
March 30th, 2006, 01:14 AM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
Nate, Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the HD100 the only native 1280x720 camera on the market? Dan Weber |
|
March 30th, 2006, 01:28 AM | #10 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Pretty much. But then again, every manu has kind of picked out the number that they think works best for their price point.
Or put another way, only the XLH-1 puts more pixels to the pavement out of the under $10k cams.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
March 30th, 2006, 01:38 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 418
|
well it didnt say anything about native 16:9 ccds in the BR-HD50e and HG100e brochure.
i think what confused me about it was the fact the lcd is in 4:3.. pretty stupid if you ask me. joe. |
March 30th, 2006, 01:56 AM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 589
|
Quote:
__________________
Our eyes allow us to see the world - The lens allows others to see the world through our eyes. RED ONE #977 |
|
March 30th, 2006, 02:12 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 418
|
i've been reading false info somewhere then, and yes your correct about viewing 16:9 on a 4:3. Oh well, im glad i've finally found out it is native 16:9. That was the only thing that i personally 'thought' the z1 had over it.
|
March 30th, 2006, 09:16 AM | #14 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Quote:
Hmmm.. I thought this well known since its debut. |
|
March 30th, 2006, 09:16 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
Not to mention that the 4x3 LCD is great for keeping some info such as the TC counter, mode and others in the letterboxed area, not cluttering the picture too much...
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
| ||||||
|
|