|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 13th, 2005, 10:27 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Question for Tim D. on HDVxDV
Hey Tim,
Can you post the procedure you use for capturing footage from HD100U to FCP using HDVxDV. Maybe a step by step guide so folks like myself can do it the right way. I found that yu have to export the Mt2 files to quicktime in order to use it in FCP. I am probably wrong and doing it the incorrect way. Please help. =0) Also, maybe you can answer a stupid question. Obviosly whenI shoot on the HD100U I am capturing full resolution, but it seems that once that it is transferred to FCP it has lost a lot of resolution. How do I keep the full resolution or is there another way to have the final cut after editing be in full resolution when you go to either DVD, film transfer etc? Thanks Duke |
December 15th, 2005, 10:23 AM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Hi Brian,
It is true that FCP won't let you actually work with m2t streams, even if you have purchased and installed the quicktime mpeg component plug-in. I'm not sure exactly how FCP digitizes 720P30 HDV and maintains native "HDV" but it certainly isn't in a normal mpeg2 transport stream. It creates new I frames for editing. So here's my current detailed workflow that you have probably already figured out.
I made a new sequence preset for 720P24 AIC so that I can quickly create new sequences.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
December 15th, 2005, 12:18 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Thanks Tim.
So how is anyone actually editing and then outputting High Definition Resolution if FCP5 doesn't allow the best resolution to be editing or imported? Maybe this is a stupid question. What if I want to transfer to film one day. How do I get the HD on to film without losing anything? It seems to me after you're done editing you are left with watered down resolution, probably not close to what was actually caputred in the camera. Correct me if I am wrong. |
December 15th, 2005, 03:37 PM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
No that's not true. The resolution stays exactly the same.
Besides, I wouldn't consider HDV to be the "best" for any post workflow, but it works well for aquisition. If you drop a CT "conformed" file into After Effects, it may show up as half the resolution, but this is because AE doesn't look at the true res, it just looks at the playback scaling. This can easily be fixed by opening in QT player, setting to "actual size" and re-saving. FCP doesn't have this problem, it always checks the true dimensions. If you want to edit for 35mm blowup, use the same workflow above transcoding to AIC codec. The AIC codec is compressed (not as much as HDV) but considered "lossless" because it doesn't seem to make the image any worse than it was before. When you have finished your offline, you can free up lots of space on your hard drive, re-convert the needed m2t files to new .mov files using an "uncompressed" 8-bit or 10-bit codec, upsample the colour to 4:2:2 or even 4:4:4 and then do your digital intermediate with those files, always rendering back to uncompressed. For most purposes, the layman is not going to see the difference between AIC or uncompressed, but once in uncompressed there is no generation loss at all.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
December 15th, 2005, 04:07 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
2 more questions for the master.
1. It seems like wqhen i impoted audio into FCP5 to play with my 24p footage that it didn't play right. There were ton of little poos on the audio. Is there adifference with audio when you work in 24p? Should I import it at a different rate or some other way? Or is it a completely different problem? 2. What harddrive do you use to capture and edit your HDV footage? I am buying one now and I want to get an external hardrive that can handle HDV and a large quantity. Trying to stay under $1000 if possible. First I was gettinga Hitachi 500 GB Deskstar 7K500 ATA, but I was told it won't work for HDV. Any suggestions? |
December 16th, 2005, 10:50 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lucerne, Switzerland
Posts: 27
|
HDVxDV crashes
Trying to work with HDVxDV, it always crashes. No way. Tried all settings. But Export to Quicktime in different formats: crashes. There is no way mailing to HDVxDV's site.
Thank you. Edwin |
December 16th, 2005, 01:24 PM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
I have not had any problems with them as of yet, but I didn't download the full version. You should probably have downloaded the trial version first. And if you did, then I woudln't buy it. |
|
December 16th, 2005, 01:55 PM | #8 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
I'm surprised because HDVxDV seems very solid to me for a small I've never had a crash with HDVxDV, but LumiereHD constantly "unexpectedly quits" or has some other buggy things happen like "grayed out" buttons that require me to reboot it.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
|
December 16th, 2005, 10:41 PM | #9 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,116
|
Quote:
Would it be too heavy for editing? I did some testing and FCP barfed on the uncompressed clips while it worked just fine with the same files exported to AIC. Don't know if it was just my system or a general issue... TIA. |
|
December 17th, 2005, 12:11 AM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
Hi Tim, What external harddrive do you use to edit and store HDV? A Raid? Any recommendations. Thanks Duke |
|
December 17th, 2005, 02:13 AM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
|
|
December 17th, 2005, 02:47 AM | #12 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,214
|
Quote:
|
|
December 17th, 2005, 06:48 AM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lucerne, Switzerland
Posts: 27
|
HDVxDV
My system: G5 2DP, 2.5GB RAM, several SATA-HD's, OS 10.4.3, HDVxDV 1.024. - I made some mistake - it didn't capture at all - there are the named files, but no content - although the clips have been played out through the JVC's firewire using HDVxDV's deck controller and playback/capture button...
I try again after this weekend. Thank you all Edwin |
December 17th, 2005, 10:17 AM | #14 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
|
December 17th, 2005, 10:19 AM | #15 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
I've been using firewire harddrives just the way I did with DV. DV is 25Mbits/sec and HDV 720P is only 19.2mbits/sec so it is actually easier on the drive.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
|
| ||||||
|
|