|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 11th, 2005, 05:38 PM | #16 | |
Major Player
|
Quote:
I love it and I'm ready to learn much more about 30p. I did a few wedding already and turned out fantastic. I just need to know for 30p recording the 30 shutter is better than 60, or just I see it that way. Please let me know Laszlo |
|
November 11th, 2005, 05:46 PM | #17 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
|
|
November 11th, 2005, 06:25 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
|
Quote:
I and my camera man see the movement is smoother with 30 shutter speed That what I meant. Anyway, if I want to record smoother moving-paning the 30 shutter is smoother than 60? Laszlo |
|
November 11th, 2005, 06:29 PM | #19 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,214
|
Quote:
|
|
November 11th, 2005, 06:55 PM | #20 | |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
|
|
November 11th, 2005, 07:51 PM | #21 | |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Quote:
I think you are missing a key point -- if you choose the right pan SPEED you will get a good looking pan. You should also engage the Motion Filter which smooths things out. Are you using it? Lastly, a pan without following a moving object is not a wise camera move. It's almost as bad as an zoom. IMHO every shot should be composed and static with action within the frame (remember you are working in widescreen) -- or the camera should be moving. Pans and zooms are for birthday party videos.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
|
November 11th, 2005, 08:08 PM | #22 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,214
|
Laszlo,
I've never shot a wedding but I'm sure it's exceedingly difficult to frame every shot without some panning motion (particularly in close quarters). Have you tried the smooth motion function? |
November 11th, 2005, 10:06 PM | #23 | |
Major Player
|
Quote:
Thanks for all of you. Yes, actually I never used the camera without smooth motion yet. When I bought the camera I start shoot with it just like with any other video cameras (60i) and I was scared by the results. (Don't forget I came from 15 years experience of 60i) I almost sent back the camera. But later I start search on the net, I find you guys, and I learn some shooting technics. Two weeks later I shoot my first wedding, and actually I very enjoyed, and the result was FANTASTIC. But we shot 720/30 with 30 shutter speed. The 60 shutter speed was a little bit (I mean just a little more) jittery. Now I'm ready to learn this fomat of video (or film?) I showed to my new costumers (brides) the already made wedding and since that, I have six new booking and all of them want 720/30 HD. Nobody even realized any jitters. All of them told me: This is look like a movie.. So different... I love it... The picture have a depth.. Look like 3D... etc. And yes with wedding I think is absolultely unpossible to just frame a shoot with a little, or nothing paning-zooming. But I try to follow this new rules for this beautyfull camera. Again, I love it and actually right now I searching for the book: American Cinematographer Manual 9th Edition Any additional help, shooting technics are more then welcome. PS: If you guys do not mined download my two two mins. basically edited footage from my first ever 720p/30 wedding is here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=7D4VC6EV (church) http://www.megaupload.com/?d=2F2ZFXKG (reception) Here you an see lot's of panning, I following dancers. Don't forget, this was my first try. I use some free site to upload my footages, so have some advertise, but otherwise it's OK Laszlo |
|
November 11th, 2005, 10:23 PM | #24 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
What would be the proper shutter for 720p24? |
|
November 11th, 2005, 10:29 PM | #25 | |
Major Player
|
Quote:
"Are you on 1/24th shutter? You should be on 1/48th for normal shooting. 1/100 if you want the "Saving Private Ryan" look." |
|
November 12th, 2005, 05:39 AM | #26 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
|
|
November 12th, 2005, 10:41 PM | #27 |
suspended -- contact admin
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 214
|
I downloaded Laszlos wedding footage and everyone is telling me of the horrible low light performence of high definition video but Laszlos video looks just fine to me. Either the reception hall had plenty of light or the low light performence of high definition video is adequate for most weddings. Also I didn't see any split screens. But maybe I am hallucinating because everyone is telling me it is impossible to watch high definition video without a 2000 dollar Blu-Ray DVD player and a 4000 dollar Plasma Television.
|
November 13th, 2005, 07:10 PM | #28 | |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Quote:
But remember: 1) You have a much wider screen so you can move back and frame to capture a wider area. 2) You've got more detail so you can shoot wider. However, once you bring it down to SD you might lose the detail so this might not work for you. Most folks will NOT see jitter when the Motion Filter is used. But, you are right that panning is the one time when the Motion Filter can be fooled. Try very slow or very fast pans.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
|
| ||||||
|
|