|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 12th, 2005, 10:20 AM | #16 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Important Note About White-balance
It is very important that you set your white balance with a "normal" setting (CINELIKE HD24P as suggested) before loading one of the new scene files.
The problem is that if you manually set your white balance after loading the a scene file with specific colour shifting (towards green for example) the white balance circuit will counter-act it. It really sucks that the white balance circuit samples the image after it has been processed, but that's the way it is. The other thing I want to mention is that for those of you using the SCN files I emailed, I just realized that the "preset" white balance switch was set for FAW instead of preset. FAW should be set to "NONE." I have corrected the mistake on all of the SCN files, so please download these the revised versions here: TD_scene_files_v2.zip Good luck, Tim |
November 12th, 2005, 08:48 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 100
|
Thx for that info Tim, now its starting to look like something!
I have a question. When I use the BLCHBYPASS setting I get flicker, specially in lowlight, do you know why? I have also noticed that the iris on the Fujinon closes down when you zoom in using the settings, I dont know if its there also when using "normal" settings but its the first time I have noticed it. When I zoom in past 40 it starts to get darker and darker...looks really weird! |
November 12th, 2005, 10:01 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
Quote:
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
|
November 13th, 2005, 12:38 AM | #19 | ||
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=54054 I have also found that heavy vignetting starts at around 40mm and you lose at least 1 stop between 40mm and 88mm. The manual for the lens claims Maximum Photometric Aperature to be T1.5. It also states that the relative aperature is "ƒ1.4 (5.5mm~68mm) ~ ƒ1.8 (88mm)". |
||
November 14th, 2005, 06:52 AM | #20 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia
Posts: 8
|
Happy to Help
Hi from Western Australia.
Love to grab your files, load them and then test them. I live in Bunbury, down on the South West coast of Western Australia. Lots of different scenery, beaches (The Indian Ocean), wineries, wheatfields and late sunsets.. Kind regards Dean |
November 14th, 2005, 09:18 AM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
Hello Tim,
I am getting the camera next weekend, so I'd love to have the files too. Kelowna, BC... snowy mountains and cold lake here at this time of the year.
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
November 14th, 2005, 09:01 PM | #22 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 41
|
HDV in NYC
Tim,
I've got a ton of projects coming up in NYC. If the settings are still available, I would love to provide you with some feedback. Best Regards, Dave Dessel |
November 17th, 2005, 03:07 PM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 240
|
I did some tests today with your Scene files Tim. I was a little confused about the white balance settings. The first batch was using one white balance I did with Cinelike24 scn file. I then loaded each of your scene's without doing another white balance. There seems to be a problem with the white balance once a new scene is loaded. It looks way off leaning towards 3200.
I then set the white balance to preset 5600 and then loaded each scene in turn. These are the jpgs with the 5600PSWB on the end. Unfortunately, I bet some of your settings were defaulting the preset mode to 3200. So, without doing a manual white balance after each load or going in and selecting 5600 preset, it's not gonna look right. Dave Beaty http://www.dreamtimeentertainment.com/hdv/ |
November 18th, 2005, 05:18 AM | #24 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Thanks Dave. You are the first to report back.
Hmmm. The white balance is interesting. Your manual balance should have been close to 5600K anyway since it looked quite bright and sunny. However, you did the right thing going with preset 5600K when you noticed something was off. My testing was all in a 3200K environment, but the colour shifting in the scene files should be based on the set white balance as a starting point. I will test this myself with some CTB and see what happens. The daylight results of the colour shifted scene files are definitely not falling exactly where I had intended, so this is useful information for me me to modify the settings. At least the REVERSAL and BLEACH BYPASS settings seemed to give the expected results - but there isn't much colour shifting programmed into them. thanks again Dave Tim |
November 18th, 2005, 05:23 AM | #25 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Dean, Jiri and David. I can't get to your email addresses for some reason (Chris is still working out some bugs with this new software upgrade) so:
Instructions for Scene File beta test are at: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showpost....0&postcount=13 You can download the 6 .SCN files from: http://homepage.mac.com/timdashwood/...e_files_v2.zip Tim |
December 31st, 2005, 02:00 PM | #26 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ft. Myers, FL
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
Tim, I just discovered that one should white balance after loading a scene file. Yes this counter acts the advanced shift settings, but there's no other way around it. We'll have to manually shift them after WB. It seems the actual white balance that is in memory will be stored when saved and thus loaded when that file is later loaded back into memory. That's what it seems like based on my casual test. Try this test, white balance and note the setting. Now load a file and check the status, it will change to the WB stored on the scene file. Just FYI. That's why my tests of your scenes were all BLUE. :) I was shooting outside and some of your scenes load up as 3000K. Dave B |
|
December 31st, 2005, 02:06 PM | #27 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,214
|
I think the way around what you have written is to re-save the scn file but have the white balance in FAW.
Last edited by Stephen L. Noe; December 31st, 2005 at 04:36 PM. |
December 31st, 2005, 03:30 PM | #28 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
The other problem I've been encountering is that the WB PAINT values seem to be absolute instead of using the base WB value as a starting point. If WB PAINT was not based on absolute values, then it should have worked like a physical colour correction filter, and therefore had the same effect in any properly white balanced setting. I'm still testing this aspect of WB PAINT. So, in the case of scene files that do not use WB PAINT values you can obviously white balance after loading the file or use a 3200K or 5600K preset. These include FILM NOIR, BLEACH BYPASS, REVERSAL, CINE WIDE LATITUDE, LOW LIGHT, & FILMOUT. In the case of WARM, WARM GREEN, FILM VERT or the DVX100 MATCH scene files, only use them in tungsten balanced light (for now) with 3200K preset. I will rename these original files as "3200K" and then create additional 5600K versions with different WB PAINT values. This is the only way I can think of to work with the JVC method of scene file storage.
__________________
Tim Dashwood |
|
December 31st, 2005, 05:32 PM | #29 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
|
|
January 1st, 2006, 04:48 PM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 282
|
Tim, do you need some more footage from us? I just followed your instructions and my shots are also too blue... I will shoot again white balancing after loading the scene files.
|
| ||||||
|
|