|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 8th, 2005, 01:17 AM | #1 |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
NATE: AIC and 24p questions
Nate posted, "FCP and iMovie will digitize even 24p using AIC, but will give you media files that are timed at 59.94."
When you say "timed" do you mean it's Item Property was 59.94? I just captured using AIC in FCP 5. Checking the media it was labeled as 29.97. Which seems like a very wrong number! The 720p60 carries the 24p using Repeat Flags. I've got to wonder if FCP can do what other NLE do with 24p -- rather than remove frames by reverse 2:3 pulldown -- they simply skip frames when playing. It saves conforming. ---------------------------------------- Just in case it helps anyone. Everyone assumed the HD1/HD10 recorded 72030 and then when it was played on the camercoder -- the analog output circuit doubled each frame to output 720p60. I now think JVC has always used Repeat Flags. With 720p30 there is one encoded frame plus Repeat Flag. Thus, I think JVC has always used a 720p60 timebase. All the playback devices were simply following standard MPEG-2 rules. The RF simply caused the last frame to be output again. That means the HDV/AIC i.LINK capture software must be dropping the RF since we know we get only 30p. But, shouldn't that mean the multiple RFs in 24p should also automatically be dropped and we get 720p24? Yet, this is not happening. I really can't figure out HOW Apple wrote their software. Did you check if Apple's MPEG-2 decoder actually might actually play the media with the Media Flags ignored.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
November 8th, 2005, 03:48 AM | #2 | |||
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
|||
November 8th, 2005, 05:07 AM | #3 |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
It seems to FCP 5, 24p AIC has a timebase of 29.97 which is what it reports after direct i.LINK capture. Thus, it plays perfectly in an AIC 29.97 Sequence, but not in 23.98 and59.94 AIC Sequences.
Cinema Tools is very happy to see the 29.97 number and will do a Batch Conform to 23.98. Now the conformed clips play perfectly in a 23.98 AIC Sequence. Of course, as you or Tim reported, Cinema tools doesn't do what it should do. It should preserve the PCM audio from the AIC QT file and marry this saved audio to the new 23.98 video. Since it doesn't we get slow audio. So I do a Batch Export of the AIC files to AIF audio-only files of the same name. Now I conform the AIC clips. Then a CTRL+OPT drag of a conformed clip brings just the video into the timeline. Now I just drag the AIF clip underneath. Then LINK. Can then drag back to a BIN. I don't know if I can load only video from an AV clip into the Source window and then ADD an audio-only clip to it. That would be very nice!
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
November 8th, 2005, 09:16 AM | #4 | |||||||
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Just so we are on the same page, here is what Nate and I both did.
By the way, Nate and I think that the AIC digitizer is actually just the coding from iMovieHD '05 that was thrown into FCP5 as a bonus. The results are repeatable by using iMovieHD. You can work with the digitized clips the same way in CT by clicking on the project file, open package contents, and then the files will be in the Media folder. The benefit of using iMovieHD is that you can actually see your clips being written into the bin. Quote:
So we are just using it to do things like slow motion or this work-around - but it was never designed for this purpose. Since our clips have the flagged frames we want, but are incorrectly playing 250% faster than they should, conforming them to 23.98 works perfectly. The problem is that the audio is also slowed down to around 19.2Khz. Hence - this method only works for M.O.S. footage. Quote:
|
|||||||
November 8th, 2005, 01:03 PM | #5 | |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Quote:
Looks like it's up to my BlackMagic card.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
|
November 8th, 2005, 08:28 PM | #6 | |
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Quote:
I'm sure someone could examine a .ts and tell for sure though... |
|
November 9th, 2005, 12:57 AM | #7 |
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
Good point. The advatnge of Repeat Frames in the data stream is that every MPEG device knows what do to. So I can plug an HD1 into any HDTV with FireWire and it automatically repeats the last frame even though it has no idea about 720p30 HDV.
In other words, I think 720p30 is ATSC 720p30. Now maybe saying the timebase was 720p60 is wrong, but what I meant -- and what I think JVC means -- is that with ATSC 720p60 there are no RF. Going to ANY lower frame rate is done by RFs. And, ATSC devices upon seeing the RFs automatically create 720p60. I think it is also a strong hint 720p60 is comming soon.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
| ||||||
|
|