|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 13th, 2005, 08:09 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 362
|
A bunch of questions from a newbie
First a little background:
I'm an advertising Creative Director. I have a strong background in animation and computers, but only a little bit of hands on time with NLE, and almost none behind a motion camera. (Though I am a competent still photographer.) My ambition is to be a filmmaker. I've been writing for a little over a year, and have gotten involved with a local producer. We're co-developing a couple of projects. My desire is to put together a basic package so that I can be as self-contained as possible, only renting for specialty equipment as needed. I think that I'm good to go on the editing side: PowerMac G5 (2Ghz x 2), 2.5 GB RAM, FCP HD and a boat-load of storage space. As for acquisition, I'm strongly leaning towards the HD100. True 24P and no fixed lens are the selling points. Okay, here goes, in no particular order (some of these are only slightly related to the camera itself:) - I grabbed a bunch of the sample M2T files floating around. After converting them to Apple's Intermediate Codec, they're all 60 FPS with a 3:2 cadence. Is this normal? Does the camera record the 24P this way to both tape and (eventualy) HD. I tried using Cinema Tools to remove the telecine, but all I ended-up with was a clip that ran very slowly. The built-in removal tool in FCP wouldn't recognize it as a file that it could manipulate. Anyone know what's going on? - As I understand it, I'm going to need a tool like DVHCapture to get footage off of tape, and then use MPEG Streamclip to make files usable in FCP. Once HD recording is available I can skip the first step? Once LumiereHD supports the cam, I can skip both steps? - What format should I convert clips to? Apple Intermediate or something else? Or not convert them at all? - Forgeting all the other pros and cons of recording to tape vs HD, do they record the exact same image (compression, et.) - Is the camera body available without the cheap Fujinon lens? I hate to pay for it when it will just go in the trash. - Is the Mini-35 set and forget, or does it need tweaked with each lens change (assuming all lenses use the same mount) ? - What are the three 35mm lenses I would need in my bag. As I understand it I need fairly "open" lenses because of the light the Mini-35 eats? - Given my use (indie filmmaking) what would be the dissadvantages of using still 35mm lenses? - What kind of tolerance is there between cameras? Can I do a two camera shoot, with the exact same settings and expect that they are going to essentially match in Post? - If you could have only 4 lights (and associated accessories) in your truck, what would they be to cover the widest variety of situations? Okay, I have lots more questions but I'll stop here for now! Thanks in advance for any answers. |
October 13th, 2005, 10:12 AM | #2 | |||||||||||
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Apple should be updating their product soon, but there is no official word from them - just confirmation of support via JVC. Quote:
This clunky workflow will change when: a) LumiereHD releases version 2.0 with full support of log/capture/pulldown removal of HDV 720P24. b) Apple updates FCP5 to natively support HDV24P with pulldown removal. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
[QUOTE=Joseph H. Moore]What are the three 35mm lenses I would need in my bag. As I understand it I need fairly "open" lenses because of the light the Mini-35 eats? Well, you definitely want fast lenses, but all the same DOF/sharpness rules apply as with 35mm shooting. I recommend Zeiss Super Speed T1.3, but the sweet spot is still going to be T4. As for choosing just three primes, that is a subjective choice, but I would recommend 18mm, 35mm and a 85mm for most dramatic uses. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I assume these lights should each draw less than 20Amps so you can plug them into separate cicuits anywhere you may be. In that case, I guess I would want to have 2 x 2000W Blondes, 1 x 650W Fresnel, 1 x 350W Fresnel for the 4 directional lights (with stands.) Then I would spend $100 and buy some 150W (#212) & 250W (#213) photo bulbs, some flood light bulb holders, and then go down to Chinatown and buy a bunch of paper lanterns ("Chinaballs"). I would also buy an AC box, a dimmer, plugs, cord and build a houshold dimmer (max 600W.) Another more advanced project would be to build a 220V to 120V dryer or stove tap breakout box. Spend the remaining budget on AC extensions, foam core, CTO, CTB, straw, 216, and some various party gels and clothes pegs. This setup would serve most "documentary" purposes and with some creative use - most dramtic purposes. |
|||||||||||
October 13th, 2005, 03:33 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 362
|
Tim,
Many thanks for tackling all of my questions in one fell swoop. If you don't mind, a little further clarification: - So is there anything I can use, today, to convert 60P to 24P? It appears to be a very simple, very consistent cadence. I'm worried that will get complicated if I edit at 60P and then need to conform it post-edit. Does that make sense? (Plus it's just a waste of storage space.) I guess it's a non-issue if LumiereHD is able to deliver ... but they're months behind schedule and I'm looking at a shoot this winter. - When I asked about HD versus film recording, I didn't mean going component out, rather I meant using a (yet to be released) device like the Firestore. So, in that scenario ... does the cam record the same HDV stream via Firewire as it does to mini-dv tape? - Lenses: They don't necessarily need to be primes. I'm just looking for the minimum number of 35mm lenses that will allow me to capture the majority of useful shots. (Again, for dramatic filmmaking, no other use.) - Does anyone rent the lens-mounts for the Mini-35? In other words could I purchase it along with a standard Canon mount, but then rent a PL mount and film lenses as needed? - Thanks for the opinion on the lights. That's very close to what I was thinking & others have opined. Just as a very rough ballpark, what should I spend on the lighting/grip package you described? Do you think the 2000's will be enough to emulate film lighting (brightness) on a medium sized location or set with the HD100? |
October 13th, 2005, 04:32 PM | #4 | |||||
Wrangler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
2000W lights are basically the brightest lights you can use on standard household circuits. Bigger lights will need a genny or studio power, seaway, joy, etc.... sounds like you want to travel light. The only other option might be 1200W HMI (daylight balanced) but then you would want square wave ballasts to shoot offspeed/variable shutter and that could get expensive. Blondes are very common and are relatively cheap. 650W or 1KW Red Heads are as well, but I prefer fresnel lenses with my smaller lights to give me more control. |
|||||
October 18th, 2005, 12:02 PM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 13
|
Great thread.
If you don't mind, can I throw in a few more noob questions? Can the HD-100 do time-lapses? Is there any way to get overcranked slo-mo shots without losing resolution? I am a PC guy, and would rather not switch to Mac just for editing. Can I put together an editing system (dual-core Dell XPS Gen5?) with Premiere Pro, and edit my feature on it, then take an EDL to a post house for color correction, etc? |
October 18th, 2005, 12:10 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 362
|
Not sure what you mean by "losing resolution." Because the camera is shooting progressive, there is no loss of spacial resolution, but you'll be fudging the temporal resolution when you add bogus frames in post.
I played around with some sample clips and halved the speed using FCP and got pretty nice results. Different NLE will differ in how well they do this. You don't have much lattitude in camera, since 30 FPS is as high as you can go in HD, and that isn't much of a bump from 24 FPS. (In the interest of full disclosure I don't have a camera, I'm basing this on specs and my experience with other's clips.) |
October 19th, 2005, 03:41 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 423
|
"Is there any way to get overcranked slo-mo shots without losing resolution?"
If you can get a capture going from the HD component outputs you get 60 full uncompressed frames per second. Thats a 100% quality 50% slo mo for 30fps or 40% slo mo for 24fps |
| ||||||
|
|